Les Sabres se rendent à Saint-Louis pour affronter les Blues de Saint-Louis, que Sneaky Joe qualifie de « FRAUDES ». Pourquoi s’agit-il de fraudes ? Joe souligne plusieurs défauts dans leur liste et certains de leurs chiffres avancés. De plus, réagissons-nous de manière excessive au fait que les Sabres utilisent régulièrement 11 attaquants et 7 défenseurs ? Et Joe est enfin prêt à participer au même jeu. Suivez et abonnez-vous sur toutes les plateformes de podcast… 🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOSabres?sid=YouTube Verrouillé sur toute la ligue de la LNH : chaque équipe, fantasy, espoirs et plus 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnNHL Follow sur Twitter : https://mobile.twitter.com/SneakyJoeSports Suivez l’émission sur Twitter https://mobile.twitter.com/LockedOnSabres #NHL #Sabres #BuffaloSabres
@Sabres de Buffalo
12 Comments
I like the 11/7 structure. We look much better.
they might be posers, but they are still better than the sabres.
We should go 9-9
🤣🤣🤣 I was the guy that called on WGR 550 this morning and mentioned it. 5 points in the past 4 games our only reg loss was when we weren’t 11-7
Stop acting like Clifton isn’t just as bad if not worse than E Johnson 5v5. Dude is horrible
Kind of proves what I've been saying and why I did not want Kane. Cause we need better 2 way players that are just able to score. But help keep the puck out their net.
I mean, the bottom 6 on this team stinks. Once healthy, including the return of Quinn, that’s when it’s a no-brainer they go with 6 dmen
It doesn't really matter if none of those 11 forwards or none of those 7 defensemen, can consistently win a damn faceoff.
Buffalo might try to acquire goaltender? Allen from Montreal? Swayman from Boston? other netminders?
balanced to have 11 forwards, 7 defense, 2 goaltenders
could Buffalo use a defensive blue liner? Tanev from Calgary? others available to acquire?
more defense zone in first period, more neutral zone in second period, more offense zone in third period?