Le défenseur des Sabres de Buffalo, Owen Power, a vu son but gagnant en prolongation contre les Oilers d’Edmonton être rappelé après qu’il a été déterminé que 20 secondes plus tôt, les Sabres étaient entrés dans la zone de hors-jeu. L’examen pour prendre cette décision a été long et les équipes étaient déjà dans le vestiaire depuis plusieurs minutes lorsque la décision finale a été prise. Après une séquence d’événements aussi ridicule, il est plus que temps pour la LNH de modifier sa gestion des avis de hors-jeu. Partagez votre opinion dans les commentaires ci-dessous! Cliquez sur J’aime et abonnez-vous ! Suivez Jesse sur Twitter à @JesseBlake Suivez Jesse sur Instagram @Jesse.Blake Abonnez-vous au Jesse Blake Sports Report partout où vous obtenez vos podcasts ! Visitez https://sdpn.ca pour en savoir plus. https://www.youtube.com/@JesseBlakeSportsReport?sub_confirmation=1
@Sabres de Buffalo
32 Comments
Wasn't this an automatic review by the league? Honestly idk how to solve this problem cause who decides what's egregious. Fans will lose their mind if they lose the stanley cup to an offside.
Technology will take over eventually. My vision is the blue stripes on the boards are lights. They light up blue when the play is offside. Until they light up, the video of the team crossing the blueline is being reviewed. If at anytime after the play is deemed offside, the lights turn red instead, the ref blows the call dead and a face off happens.
Till then, everything gets viewed in real time. If it is unconclusive then it's a goal. Also, if a defending player, other than the goalie, touches the puck before the puck goes in the net, offside is waived off.
I think it should be a time thing. Over 10 seconds, the goal stands. Whether or not a puck crossed the line is given the same scrutiny. Offsides is offsides. After some time though it's irrelevant to the play.
1 word. Ridiculous. The game of hockey should not come down to millimeters involving super-slo-mo 5-10min reviews. It's gotten so insanely stupid that even when one of these calls goes IN MY TEAM'S FAVOUR I still get angry. I'm absolutely sick and tired of the NHL trying to make calls by analyzing everything on a scientific level. It's boring, it's annoying, it's aggravating. CUT IT OUT!
I've been saying this for forever, if the refs can't watch a full speed replay and see it's offside with enough certainty to overturn the call then it shouldn't be overturned.
Ok so you're saying if it's "a millimeter" offside, it's NOT offside? How about 2 millimeters? 3? You have to draw the line somewhere, it's either offside or it's not, otherwise we're right back to 2013.
The puck actually wasnt laying flat another view shows back of puck in air which makes it potentially not offsides, thats how close it was
Doesn't this technology exist already in tennis and it takes 15 seconds to determine if a ball is hit in/out?
Thanks!
Agree 💯!
I haven't seen this same outrage all the dozen times the Oilers have had reviews exactly like this go against the Oilers. McDavid had made the comment earlier this season that if the review requires 10 minutes and telescopic zoom, it shouldn't be taken away.
I think the best way to fix this is just to say that if the puck is on the line when the players cross it, it's onsides, because if the players are toeing the line with possession then the puck can be on the line without it being offsides but when you're entering it can't? makes no sense
I shut off the game right after Buffalo scored and didn't know what happened until I watched coach K's interview.
I like your third ref idea. If it's going to be called it should be immediately.
Great video.
Limit review to 60 seconds. If you cant tell in that time move along
To be fair, half the stadium was already empty.
These review system is toddler level
Should be non reviewable. If it’s that close who cares
not only that an edmonton player touched the puck which should have eliminated the offisides. I have been saying if the goal is sored like 15 seconds after zone entry it shouldn't be reviewable
What's to fix? If the play was offside, it was offiside, no goal.
Jesse. I like your idea of having blue line refs for calling offsides that are missed. I also like the idea of only enforcing it if a goal occurs before 10 seconds has elapsed.
So you'd rather have one team, any team get screwed by a missed call, than get the call right . If it's offside even by a milimeter it's offside. What is more important is the stupid breakaway penalties when the defensive player just touches the glove , hand or stick of the one on the breakaway. Or even more ridiculous is the cross checking in front of the nets…especially after the playis whistled dead.
This is a perfect take. Well done!
Great vid Jessie! We can’t have this in the playoffs the league is way off yet again.
I never liked offside reviews at all. But if you want them when it's 3 feet offside, you have to accept it if it's 1cm offside.
Gretzky probably would have only had about 60 points a year under todays scrutiny lol
Officiating has lost the plot, every game has bad calls and every other games has revoked goals.
That being said, the NHL has some weird rules, such as offsides being only one of the feet need to be on the blue line for it not to be offsides. Maybe I its because I grew up in other leagues, but offsides used to be any either leg over the blue line was offsides, even if the other was on sides. The other thing, I have been watching NHL since December and and I don't understand the icing rule on bit. I grew up with it needing to cross both the red half point and go past the goal for icing, unless a player got to the puck. In NHL, sometimes it gets dumped in from the nearest blue line and it gets called for icing. I don't understand what the point of racing to the puck to prevent icing is even for, the guy trying to prevent icing could be close enough to touch the defender and it gets called for icing.
I would disagree about reviewing the footage though, it should provide more accountability to the refs on the ice, as they pretty much can call whatever they want anyways right now. The whole point of offsides isn't to be lenient, and a ref missing an offsides call that leads to a goal is really not good for the other team.
I'd agree that there needs to be a time limit on a review, but officiating sucks mainly because there is no consistency with calls ever. The coach and team need some way to challenge a ref though, as often enough they make stupid calls and nothing ever happens because they are refs and their word is official and they know best.
They didn’t even know they would find an offsides 20 seconds earlier.
It’s not the sprite of the rule
Or just make it electronic… chips in skates and the puck… not that complicated. Just a little software and assigning one teams chips in one direction and visa-versa.. one skate can enter without the puck but not both from same player. This is the only complication to solve. And still shouldn’t be the hard for a few engineers to figure out.
Dude.. it was offside. Those are the rules. And whats up with saying if a ref doesnt catch it just let it go?!?! Dude, too much will be at stake like in the Finals. It will ruin hockey. Pick a new hill to die on, not subbing
This 1 million percent!!!!!!
The Panthers had a goal disallowed against the Flames for the same thing last night. On the offside review you could barely see a sliver of white between the blue line and the puck. Luckily it didn’t matter since the Panthers won easily anyway.
100% agree with your take. Happened to the Avs vs the Wild the other day but I was glad cuz wanted my home state Wild to get a point but wanted my team to win