En 1999, Brett Hull a marqué le but le plus controversé de l’histoire de la LNH lors de la finale de la Coupe Stanley 1999.
En 1999, Brett Hull a marqué le but le plus controversé de l’histoire de la LNH lors de la finale de la Coupe Stanley 1999.
37 Comments
No Goal
Ah, Buffalo: The Rodney Dangerfield of professional sports. No matter what we do, we can't get no respect.
Y'know, like losing game six of the Cup finals in triple OT to a ref who had somewhere better to be that night.
LOL just another example of professional sports rigging the outcome
I watched this game in a hotel room with about 15 of my elementary school classmates. We were on our grade 8 trip through London, Niagra Falls and Toronto. I think we were in London at the time. Every single one of us knew this goal was complete BS. It was such a ridiculous rule. Its all a pretty nostalgic time for me though.
Sort of forgot that even as late as 1999, NHL teams still wore white sweaters at home
And then both Hasek and Hull played for the Red Wings team that won the Stanley cup in 2002.
the way hasek was able to cover the net was insane.
I still vividly remember watching this game!!!
There were nights back then noone was putting the puck past Dom
Man I miss Clement and Thorne announcing Cup finals.
This proves all sports is fixed. Stop watching sports after this and started back watching wrestling because both are pre determined atleast one knows it😂
Great vid! What a stupid rule.
As a Buffalonian, I didn't even need to click the video. I just needed to see the thumbnail and the title, and I knew immediately what it'd be about.
The fact this (and Philadelphia in 1975) was the closest Rick Jeanneret ever got to calling a winning one makes me very sad.
I hope they recorded some sort of message from him, before he passed, for someday, that one glorious day, that the Sabres finally take it all.
I loved that Red Wings team back then with Federov and Yzerman. They were my team in NHL '96 on SNES!
Honestly, I still can't believe you couldn't have your feet anywhere in the crease unless the puck was in. Like that is hella constrictive, and if it was to combat goalie interference, then it should be taken as a case-by-case basis by review/instant replay. Sucks the sabres had to be the victim
Broke my heart as a kid in buffalo
Kinda low key mad that I was reminded that the Blackhawks had BOTH Belfour and Hasek 🤔
Bettman has been ruining hockey for a long time
Loved seeing both of them with the Wings
Buffalo sports in the 90s…ouch
They purely changed the rules about standing in the crease, so this wasn't a problem anymore. Hasek and the Sabres were robbed
So the call was right there was just no fan alive that could have known that at the time though. All these years I thought they just got it wrong. Why wouldn’t that clarification be made public knowledge. Such an easy controversy to avoid.
100% of the blame for this chaotic rigamarole sits squarely on the shoulders of one Jewish non-athlete attorney from New York: NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman. Period!!!
Such a stupid rule.
Yes the goal should count. Really dumb.
236 goals in 82 games is “whooping”?
I loved this era of the giant goalie pads
We got robbed!!!!
The way you said Madano's name was the most Midwestern thing I've ever heard lol
Ken Hitchcock, if you say it really fast it sounds like…
With the Hull goal they could explain it as the goal scorer entered the crease bubble & not an interference from another player, no?
How is Bettman still in charge?
Get rid of the crease in its entirety & only disallow contact with the goalie by opposing players or the shooter! Easily solved!
Hockey was so much better back then.
All 5 hockey fans went nuts
Pat Burns Bruins were robbed 😤 with the f*cking "foot in the creese"
Hasek flopping like a fish out of water was the Luckiest goalie, horseshoe up his a$$