Cette semaine, sur le podcast San Jose Hockey Now, les Sharks de San Jose devraient-ils échanger contre Simon Nemec ? (1:10:04) De plus, qui sont nos gagnants des prix de mi-saison 2024-2025 ? (30:48) Mais avant tout ça, nous couvrons quelques actualités de la semaine dernière ! Premièrement, les Sharks sont… mauvais. (1:40) Nous couvrons les dernières défaites décevantes des Sharks et où nous pensons que les Sharks de San Jose se situent par rapport à l’année dernière. Ensuite, nous abordons l’ascension de Matthew Schaefer jusqu’à peut-être le consensus n°1 du repêchage de 2025. Que pourrait signifier Schaefer pour les Sharks ? (07:42) Qui est le top quatre de Keegan entre Schaefer, James Hagens, Porter Martone et Michael Misa ? Keegan a pu voir les Sharks à Boston et était assis derrière le banc. Qu’a-t-il remarqué sur le banc ? Qu’ont pensé Sheng et Keegan du jeu de déclaration de Will Smith à Boston ? (17:55) Maintenant, quels joueurs remportent les très convoités récompenses de mi-saison du podcast SJHN ? (30:48) Nous couvrons : MVP, Meilleur attaquant et défenseur, Le plus amélioré, Héros méconnu, Joueur le plus décevant, Espoir endormi, Espoir le plus surprenant, Requin en deuxième mi-temps, et enfin, en bonus, nous prédisons chacun un Sharks. ‘ Accord sur la date limite des échanges. Finalement, que pensent les dépisteurs de la LNH de Simon Nemec ? Pourrait-il constituer une cible commerciale pour les Sharks de San Jose ? (1:10:04). Nous prévoyons que le coût sera assez élevé, mais le paieriez-vous ? Merci à tous d’avoir écouté, regardé et souscrit !
9 Comments
Sharks need to get best player available.
Schaefer is just about a full year younger than the other top prospects as well.
What a shit show in Nashville eh
I think Zetterlund has more value than people think. Right now he'd be NJ's 5th top scorer, and it seems like they need more depth scoring with Zetterlund already being a known quantity for them. And in the offseason maybe you can do a sign and trade for Granlund while retaining a generous chunk since Burns is off the books by then. If what your scouts say is true about Nemec, then maybe that makes this trade closer to fair value. Might as well throw in Bordeleau too.
It's just one scout's opinion, but Corey Pronman from the Athletic just put out his list of top NHL players under 23 years old. He had Eklund at #30, Nemec at #81, and Bystedt at #90.
37:40 It was the pick for Leo Sahlin Wallenius. The pick to trade up for Dickinson was the one from the Devils acquired in the Timo Meier trade.
Edit: And you corrected yourself and figured it out within the next couple of minutes. To expand though, the pick from the Walman trade was 53rd and the pick from Timo was the 42nd.
The Sharks should certainly be in the conversation concerning Nemec considering the Devils will be looking to bolster their team for the playoffs
Asked elsewhere, for this next free agency. If sharks trade a number of granlund, kunin, sterm, rutta, etc. are you for short term over paid contracts. Pinpoint a few players you want. Go short term, good chunk over paid. Harder to trade but safe term. Kinda like wennberg.
We need vets around the youth. And with more youth added. You need to hit on your vets. Over pay for short term guidance. Less chance of return in assets.
If looking long term. Barring making 100% sense like Tyler. Look elsewhere or hold on move.
I'm hoping for Schaefer like everyone else but at what point is there too many on the left hand side? I'm a believer of BPA in the draft but do you just hope to move one LHD? If we were lucky enough to get Schaefer, we'd have him, Dickinson, Mukh, Cagnoni, and also Wallenius that can't be discounted. Feels like stacking that many would stunt one or more of their development. Idk just feels like the right side is pretty empty in our system and that probably won't get addressed for a while given where our picks stand and the FA market.