@Avalanche du Colorado

Pilariers de la LNH | Avalanche vs Kings | 12 avril 2025



Regardez le jeu complet dans les points forts de la LNH du match entre l’Avalanche du Colorado et les Kings de Los Angeles le 12 avril 2025, condensant toute l’action dans un récapitulatif de 10 minutes 00:00 1ère période 03:40 2ème période 07:12 3e périodes News, scores, statistiques, analyse et temps réel: https://www. https://youtube.com/nhl Suivez la NHL sur les réseaux sociaux: NHL X: https://twitter.com/nhl NHL Facebook: https://facebook.com/nhl nhl Instagram: https://instagram.com/nhl #kings #avalanche #nhl #highlights

11 Comments

  1. 😍😍😍Kings have 101 points with 3 more games in regular season. The next two games will be on the road.

  2. Avalanche need a real name. Mountain Lions would be far better than that stupid Avalanche name. But then, hockey sucks, so I don't care.

  3. Personally, I can not make up my mind whether the replay ruling on Quinton Byfield's goal was definitive. Factions certain it was clearly a goal may argue the final result with others who believe the play was clearly offside.
    The same situation occurred recently with Austin Matthews' of the Toronto Maple Leafs contested high-stick goal which was challenged by the Kings. In both that game and today's, I agree with the coaches risking a challenge, even though both failed.
    Ignoring whether the two examples I have cited were correctly or incorrectly called, I would like to see a less punitive system where a delay of game is not assessed under circumstances when challenging legitimately questionable calls on the ice which are then upheld solely because replays are too indecisive to reverse them. I feel only definitive replays proving that coaches' challenges were wrong should result in delay of game penalties.
    I am only certain that I am glad the Kings won. (although I challenge Toronto's use of "Leafs" instead of "Leaves")

Write A Comment

Pin