@Sharks de San José

Simuler l’intersaison: une intersaison conservatrice de 2025 pourrait conduire à une tournure de dépenses massive en 2026



Les Sharks de San Jose pourraient-ils se préparer pour une grande éclaboussure en 2026? L’intersaison simulée de JD Young révèle une approche stratégique qui ouvre la voie à une agression future. De l’extension de William Eklund à un accord de 8,5 millions de dollars sur 8 ans pour rédiger Michael Misa deuxième au classement général, chaque mouvement vise à équilibrer l’acquisition de talents avec la flexibilité du CAP. Young décompose la situation salariale prévue des Sharks, mettant en évidence un potentiel de 52 millions de dollars dans l’espace de plafond pour la saison 2026-27. Cette liberté financière pourrait permettre à GM Mike Grier de cibler des agents libres de haut niveau comme Kyle Connor ou Jack Eichel, accélérant la reconstruction si les jeunes stars comme Macklin Celebrini et Will Smith se développent comme espéré. L’hôte analyse les expirations du contrat à venir, notant comment ils créent des opportunités pour remodeler la liste. Avec seulement quelques engagements à long terme sur la défense, les Sharks ont de la place pour promouvoir des prospects comme Sam Dickinson ou ajouter des talents établis. Young fait valoir que même si les Sharks pourraient encore lutter la saison prochaine, l’ère du « tanking » intentionnel est probablement terminée. Il fait l’éloge du travail de Grier dans le positionnement de l’équipe pour un succès futur, suggérant que des mouvements agressifs pourraient arriver plus tôt que prévu si les bonnes opportunités se présentent. Branchez-vous pour entendre l’analyse détaillée de Young sur la façon dont les mouvements actuels des Sharks pourraient conduire à une intersaison transformatrice de 2026 et potentiellement accélérer leur retour aux ligabilités. Suivez et abonnez-vous sur toutes les plates-formes de podcast… 🎧 https://lockedonpodcasts.com/podcasts/locked-on-sharks/ verrouillées sur la Ligue de la NHL: chaque équipe, fantaisie, prospects et plus 🎧 https://linktr.ee/lockedonnhl nous soutient en soutenant nos parrainages! L’épisode d’aujourd’hui de Gametime vous est présenté par GameTime. Téléchargez l’application GameTime, créez un compte et utilisez le code LockedOnNhl pour 20 $ de réduction sur votre premier achat. Les termes et conditions s’appliquent. L’argent du monarque prend le contrôle de vos finances avec de l’argent monarque. Utilisez le code Lockedonnhl sur Monarchmoney.com pour 50% de réduction sur votre première année. De merveilleuses pistaches se gênent et se fissurent avec la collation qui emballe un punch protéique. Visitez Wonderfulpistachios.com pour en savoir plus! L’épisode d’aujourd’hui vous est apporté par FanDuel. À l’heure actuelle, les nouveaux clients FanDuel peuvent obtenir deux cents dollars de paris bonus si votre premier pari de cinq premiers dollars gagne! Avis de non-responsabilité Fanduel: 21+ dans certains états. Premier pari en ligne en ligne en ligne uniquement. Bonus émis comme paris gratuits sans dédale qui expire en 14 jours. Les restrictions s’appliquent. Voir les termes sur SportsBook.fanduel.com. Problème de jeu? Appelez le 1-800-Gambler ou visitez fanduel.com/rg (Co, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-next-Step ou Text NextStep à 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 ou visitez CCPG.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-With-It (dans) 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) ou visitez Ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-Stop (LA), 1-877-8-Hopeny ou Text HoPeny (467369) (NY), TN Redline 1-800-889-9789 (TN)

10 Comments

  1. One more down season. Get Keaton Verhoff in the next draft. If somehow, Sharks wind up with the McKenna pick, trade down, get a haul and get Verhoff. Get to the cap floor with 2-3 short term overpays next offseason. The cap floor issue goes away once Macklin, Smith, Eklund and perhaps Askarov are under bigger deals. Plus, Sharks will have a better idea where to be aggressive.

  2. We can improve greatly next season and make huge strides forward while still ending up with a top 3 pick next draft. And I think that’s exactly what the Sharks should do. They can improve to a near .500 team and still end up with as one of the bottom 3 teams in the regular season standings.
    I think that would be hands down the best outcome possible for next year (in my humble opinion).

    10 more wins next year would give us a 30-40-12 record (compared to last year’s 20-50-12). That would give us 72 points, a 20 point increase year-over-year… which would be a huge improvement, and a very successful season …
    —> And that STILL would put us at the 3rd worst team in the standings (hypothetically assuming all the other team’s records stay exactly the same as they finished last year, just for the sake of this example).

    And, if we pick 3rd overall next draft, that would put us in very good position to draft the exact player we so desperately need next year in
    👉Keaton Verhoeff.

    It’s not going to be a “tank for McKenna” year… it’s going to be a “improve-a-little but still partially-tank for Verhoeff.” Lol

    That’s the absolute best case scenario for next season (imo).
    Fans are happy with a super solid improvement, and definitive step forward with 10 more wins & 20 more points… getting closer to being a .500 club. While also still getting a top 3 draft pick.
    We really, really need to snag Verhoeff next draft. I truly believe adding KV to this young team would be even more beneficial to the rebuild than adding McKenna would be.

    And then the year after that we should be looking at a .500 team, which means we’re not going to just keep tanking forever like some people are worried about.
    We should be trying to slowly improve , adding 10 more wins or so each year, while still getting a top 3-5 pick next year, and then a top 10-15 pick the following year, and then competing for the playoffs the year after that.

  3. I think you did a good job building what a realistic offseason could look like, but there’s a simple issue: pound-for-pound, I don’t believe this 23-man roster is a better team than last year (at least without heavily leaning on leaps from our ELC guys). And they aren’t going to get the 10-20 point jump that the Sharks’ FO seems to be aiming for.

    This isn’t really a knock on any specific moves, but just an indictment on how weak this FA class is overall. Seeing how hard it’s gonna be to replace Granlund/Walman/Zetterlund/etc, it makes me seriously wonder if it would’ve been better to keep at least one of them along, if the plan was to start building up this summer.

  4. Liked how you wrapped this up JD! This was my favorite set of episodes you have done since I have been watching your channel. Congratulations!

    Overall, I think your plan is in line with what I think GMMG would do and not only improves the team now but will pay big dividends as next season progresses and provides for the following offseason.

    I really appreciate you talking about the cap situation and how GMMG has managed it.
    He must have learned quite a bit from his brother in Miami! 🙂

    You echo what a GM on Sheng's podcast stated and what I have been saying for over two years now. GMMG has planned for the cap to be cleaned by the end of next season.

    He deftly, patiently, and wisely removed the contracts that boxed him into a cap corner and gave himself room to maneuver. He provided himself flexibility and if anyone watched the cap numbers since he took over a GM that flexibility has progressively gotten better each season.

    One contract at a time; through shrewd trades and wise draft selections, GMMG has put the Sharks into the best position than they have been in over a decade.

    He has two more bad contracts to go. Pickles at the end of this season and Coots the season after that. But the cap will be as clean as it can be by the end of next season.

    Just so happens that the 2026-2027 FA class is far deeper and much more talented than this current FA class. It also just so happens that Celebrini, Smith, Graf, Muk, Eklund and Askarov will mostly have established themselves as NHL players at that time. Each making more significant impacts on the Sharks.

    With plenty of talent not far behind in Musty, Lund, Chernyshov, Dickinson, Bystedt, and others. With another set after that in Muldowney, Wallenius, and Pohlkamp to name a couple.

    Funny how that works out. Clean cap, lots of talented young players making an NHL impact, more players not far behind no major contracts weighing down the cap, no big contracts to sign.

    The only big contract kicking in (at least I hope it is) will be Eklund's. The biggest contract he will sign (as of now) will be extensions for Askarov, Celebrini and Smith. These are extensions, i.e., not effect his ability to acquire FAs. Also add another 8 mil to the expected 10 mil or so jump in the cap in that offseason. What!?

    But what puts him in another level is how he has handled the draft. Go down the list of the last three drafts and list the prospects that are in the pros or a progressing above expectations from where they were drafted.

    Now, this draft is almost perfect for the Sharks needs! He cannot get the cherry on the cake (making it almost perfect) which would be Schaefer, but he can fill his other needs.

    Depth in the goalie prospects, filling in the middle six prospects (and bottom six to an extent) and diversifying/deepening his defensive prospect pool.

    The future is teal.

  5. FYI Knyzhov doesn’t count against the cap. His contract was mutually terminated, not bought out.

  6. Honestly as much as I like your mock roster, I don't like u didn't count in Cardwell and Thompson. Both deserves a full season in the NHL and they proved it already many times.

Write A Comment

Pin