@Sénateurs d'Ottawa

Faits saillants de la LNH | Mammoth contre Sénateurs – 9 novembre 2025



Ridly Greig a marqué un but et ajouté une passe au total gagnant de Nick Cousins ​​​​pour pousser les Sénateurs d’Ottawa à une victoire de 4-2 contre les Mammoth de l’Utah. ———————————————- 📺 http://sportsnetplus.ca – Diffusez en direct sur Sportsnet+ 💻 http://www.sportsnet.ca – Plus de nouvelles et de faits saillants sur Sportsnet.ca https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVhibwHk4WKw4leUt6JfRLg https://www.facebook.com/sportsnet https://twitter.com/sportsnet https://www.instagram.com/sportsnet/ https://www.tiktok.com/@sportsnet ———————————————- #NHL 00:00:00 – 1ère période de régulation 00:04:13 – 2ème période de régulation 00:07:28 – 3ème période de régulation

26 Comments

  1. Utah has the talent, they need solid coaching. Smith needs to get Jon Cooper to come to SLC after his contract with TB is up.

  2. Стыд и позор судейству. Отобрать чистый гол у Юты. Как не стыдно.?

  3. Did Sportsnet actually show the goal and then show the call overturning that goal? I didn’t think I’d ever see the day.

  4. That was a good goal, Im sick of these new criteria, a touch isn't interference.

  5. We got stole a goal last night ( habs fan ) and we lost that game by 1 goal . Ref suck $$hahha

  6. Rule 69 – Interference on the Goalkeeper

    69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper – This rule is based on the premise

    that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the

    crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be

    allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking

    players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances

    be allowed (refer to Rule 69.7 for example). Goals should be

    disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or

    by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his

    crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates

    intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of

    his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted,

    and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of

    the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable

    effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in

    accordance with the on-ice judgement of the Referee(s), but may be

    subject to a Coach’s Challenge (see Rule 38).

    For purposes of this rule, “contact,” whether incidental or

    otherwise, shall mean any contact that is made between or among a

    goalkeeper and attacking player(s), whether by means of a stick or

    any part of the body.

    The overriding rationale of this rule is that a goalkeeper should

    have the ability to move freely within his goal crease without being

    hindered by the actions of an attacking player. If an attacking player

    enters the goal crease and, by his actions, impairs the goalkeeper’s

    ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be

    disallowed.

    If an attacking player has been pushed, shoved, or fouled by a

    defending player so as to cause him to come into contact with the

    goalkeeper, such contact will not be deemed contact initiated by the

    attacking player for purposes of this rule, provided the attacking player

    has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.

  7. Okay I’ve seen enough to say both Spence and Merilainen need to be playing more, Spence as an every day DMan and Merilainen as a 1B to take some weight off of Ullmark (his best year was in the almost even split tandem with Sway, let’s learn from that…)

  8. Когда смотришь такую игру,понимаешь хоккей дело молодых,иначе он становится не интересен

Write A Comment

Pin