I thought the eye test showed Trocheck was everything you’d want him to be and miller still looked like a guy who was playing hurt but, whatever.
TwinkiesForAmerica
they were role players but i also think the 17 for 17 is largely due to Bucky
debid4716
If it boosts Trocheks trade value, I hope they keep pushing this fact
Stuckbetweenstations
One more thing…price of the ‘chek going up
phily724
USA did a great job of executed their plan of packing the interior. We saw it with the win last year against Canada at 4 nations. It’s to no surprise it looked a lot like the Rangers of the past decade plus with Torts on the coaching staff for USA.
Asparagus_Abject
Never seen a fan base so happy to know that their best players are good 4th line role players when compared amongst their peers
mattrydell
Well now you have to think hypothetically…. If Caufield and Robertson are on the team instead of JT and Troch, is the PK a perfect 17 out of 17 ?? Whos leading the kill instead ??
Then again if Bedard, Schaffer, Morrisey and Crosby are playing in the gold medal game does Canada still only score 1 goal ??
Also If the Sweden coach actually uses his brain to they seed higher ?
Well then If Barkov isn’t hurt does Finland maybe beat Canada ????
I guess anything could be a what if lol so why bother wasting brain power on it. I wasted my time
JokinHghar
Good maybe we can trade both their fascist asses for some picks
Captain_Pidgey
That 5 on 3 was the stuff of legends! 40%+ PP for Canada and they couldn’t score!
🦅🇺🇸🥇
Lazy_Friendship_9719
I still can’t believe they stopped a 5 on 3 when two of those guys were McDavid and MacKinnon.
12 Comments
I thought the eye test showed Trocheck was everything you’d want him to be and miller still looked like a guy who was playing hurt but, whatever.
they were role players but i also think the 17 for 17 is largely due to Bucky
If it boosts Trocheks trade value, I hope they keep pushing this fact
One more thing…price of the ‘chek going up
USA did a great job of executed their plan of packing the interior. We saw it with the win last year against Canada at 4 nations. It’s to no surprise it looked a lot like the Rangers of the past decade plus with Torts on the coaching staff for USA.
Never seen a fan base so happy to know that their best players are good 4th line role players when compared amongst their peers
Well now you have to think hypothetically…. If Caufield and Robertson are on the team instead of JT and Troch, is the PK a perfect 17 out of 17 ?? Whos leading the kill instead ??
Then again if Bedard, Schaffer, Morrisey and Crosby are playing in the gold medal game does Canada still only score 1 goal ??
Also If the Sweden coach actually uses his brain to they seed higher ?
Well then If Barkov isn’t hurt does Finland maybe beat Canada ????
I guess anything could be a what if lol so why bother wasting brain power on it. I wasted my time
Good maybe we can trade both their fascist asses for some picks
That 5 on 3 was the stuff of legends! 40%+ PP for Canada and they couldn’t score!
🦅🇺🇸🥇
I still can’t believe they stopped a 5 on 3 when two of those guys were McDavid and MacKinnon.
How does this stat help the rangers ?
… but can they win a game at home?