Conor Garland turns 30 next Wednesday. He has a 6×6 contract that kicks in on July 1. He has not scored a goal since December 16.
RichAbbreviations966
Yeah this guy hasn’t scored in two and a half months…as a winger
JBR409
Can we please stop with the secondary or worse scorers
LordChaosBaelish
Perhaps we can interest them in a Jonathan Drouin?
BruceShark88
No thanks.
Maybe add a solid d-man or a winger (who can actually score) WITHOUT giving up a top prospect, and I would say that would be a good trade for us.
Slipperee_99
Hopefully he’s talking about the pretty stuff you put on a Christmas tree 🤔
toledosurprised
would be a terrible move
SteveSomers
Oh no, no thank you. I am happy to keep my eyes right where they are. On prospects and the team winning on the ice, not on that ass contract and goal drought
daveloper80
I don’t get this one at all. We need to upgrade one (or two) of Duclair, Drouin and Shabanov. This is not that.
edit – and Palat if I’m being honest!!
Baww18
This would be a disaster.
AlobarTheTimeless
I actually really like Connor garlands game. Dude has a motor, and has been incredibly unlucky with a 6.8% shooting percentage. It also must be depressing as hell playing on the Canucks.
Ship out shabanov, drouin and duke… garland is a big upgrade to all 3.
tedsmarmalademporium
Gets around 18/20 goals a season outside of this year. Canucks are god awful this year and he has 26 points. Not giving Duke this deal so why add contract for dukes production. This is a pass for me. They need a difference maker not another middle/bottom 6
jholden23
Fuck. An open trumper. I don’t want him.
SmashYourEnemies02
No, for the love of god no!
BKong64
Please God no
Ih8AmazonButUseIt
Old Max Shabanov at 6×6. Let’s hope Stefen is wrong
18 Comments
Conor Garland turns 30 next Wednesday. He has a 6×6 contract that kicks in on July 1. He has not scored a goal since December 16.
Yeah this guy hasn’t scored in two and a half months…as a winger
Can we please stop with the secondary or worse scorers
Perhaps we can interest them in a Jonathan Drouin?
No thanks.
Maybe add a solid d-man or a winger (who can actually score) WITHOUT giving up a top prospect, and I would say that would be a good trade for us.
Hopefully he’s talking about the pretty stuff you put on a Christmas tree 🤔
would be a terrible move
Oh no, no thank you. I am happy to keep my eyes right where they are. On prospects and the team winning on the ice, not on that ass contract and goal drought
I don’t get this one at all. We need to upgrade one (or two) of Duclair, Drouin and Shabanov. This is not that.
edit – and Palat if I’m being honest!!
This would be a disaster.
I actually really like Connor garlands game. Dude has a motor, and has been incredibly unlucky with a 6.8% shooting percentage. It also must be depressing as hell playing on the Canucks.
Ship out shabanov, drouin and duke… garland is a big upgrade to all 3.
Gets around 18/20 goals a season outside of this year. Canucks are god awful this year and he has 26 points. Not giving Duke this deal so why add contract for dukes production. This is a pass for me. They need a difference maker not another middle/bottom 6
Fuck. An open trumper. I don’t want him.
No, for the love of god no!
Please God no
Old Max Shabanov at 6×6. Let’s hope Stefen is wrong
Nooooo
That seems like a very bad idea