@Penguins de Pittsburgh

Classement centile des patineurs de la saison complète 5v5 des Penguins de Pittsburgh


Classement centile des patineurs de la saison complète 5v5 des Penguins de Pittsburgh

—
golfy_m8

12 Comments

  1. clearcloseall

    Granlund sticks out here as an obvious interesting case. You really wonder how he’d look with a full season in the Pens’ middle-six with trustworthy goaltending behind him and perhaps slightly better finishing luck.

    Overall, seems like this really paints goaltending/finishing as our problem at 5-on-5 last year. I mean, all eight defensemen were above the 50th percentile on xG%, and the majority of them were above the 80th(!) percentile.

  2. Kidspud

    If I’m reading this right, Granlund just had absolute crap luck? Or is the discrepancy from xGoals to his actual points percentile reflective of a talent gap?

  3. tinygaynarcissist

    Woof, Carter. And poor snake-bitten Teddy. I genuinely didn’t realise Granlund played 21 games; you could’ve told me he had only played 2 or that he had played 60 and I would’ve had to believe you because I don’t recall anything he did. I just remember Bob or Mears calling him a « former Predator » once and it feeling weird.

  5. CattleDogCurmudgeon

    As a reminder, stats like this are often misleading because they don’t account for matchups. A player may have a poor goals against because they’re playing against other teams’ top lines, or vice versa.

  6. Sex_E_Searcher

    Geno dropping a 96% xGF season when people were calling him washed.

  9. Supervisor3000

    Surprised Dumoulin doesn’t have more red. Having said that, his time as a Penguin should be over. Can’t bring him back, even cheaper.

  10. BeeWithWheels

    Someone tell me what the numbers mean so I know how to feel

  11. phandec

    Of course that’s Sid’s xG% percentile.

  12. chicago859

    Well well well if it isn’t the granlund defensive stats no one wanted to hear about again

Write A Comment

Pin