Embarasse is a bit strong. 89 Points is still good, but I doubt he only gets 89 and I also doubt Bedard gets 90. And anyway ESPN points predictions are complete trash. They predicted Marchand to have 46 points… Marchand could come back from hip surgery in the middle of the season again and make more than 46 points.
PoopSlinger23
Bedard won’t sniff 90 points.
2BFrank69
Crosby will out point Bedard.
Position_Extreme
Jeebus! Can’t they wait until the kid has played even one shift in the NHL?!?
GoPensGo8758
Crosby was a 100 point player at 18 and McDavid was point a game in what was the dead puck era 2.0, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Bedard but up 90+
Grouchy_Situation_33
ESPN. ‘Nuff said.
mitch-dubz
Can we stop giving a shit about ESPN? They know nothing and care nothing of hockey.
haikara7
more like they embarrassed themselves
Deadbolt2023
Pants in a bunch over ESPN?!? C’mon boys – you are better than that.
For the record, my #2 team is the ‘Hawks – and I don’t think there’s a chance in Hades Bedard outpoints Crosby.
Kid hasn’t played a game…
TripleBicepsBumber
Everyone who regularly follows hockey knows this isn’t going to be the case if Crosby stays healthy. I feel like 65 points with a high of 70s is a more realistic projection for Bedard but I guess we’ll see in seven months
Mcb17lnp
Espn doesn’t know anything about hockey
ubcthrowaway-01
Espn also had Marchand around 40 points…
TJTrapJesus
Wait until you see that they projected Slafkovsky (55 points) to get more points than Marchand (46).
ImShyGuy93
I’m glad they embarrassed him, keep it going 😎
lhoom
Crosby had 102 points in his rookie season.
Play1Dad
With what support will Bedard hit 90 points? Chicago is a hockey hellscape right now.
ConrrHD
Bedard will be fantastic, but let’s be realistic 60-70 points is most likely and still fantastic for a rookie
Jefflehem
When did ESPN find out about hockey?
Dust601
Weird, I look at it more like espn embarrassing themselves
Deraj2004
Bedard is going to be good but no way he passes Crosby just based on the fact of teammates.
TremorChristPJ
It’s Espn… I’m surprised they know there are other sports besides basketball and Yankees baseball.
LouisWu987
Can we all agree that maybe ESPN should put down the hockey and just walk away before they hurt themselves?
lovingvictoralpha
Chicago has 13 nationally televised games this season. All because of Bedard. Gotta get the hype machine going early.
BlindLantern
Espn is shit for hockey. They spend more time on fantasy football.
JKray5_Reddit
RemindMe! 8 months
jcdevries92
I could see bedard getting 90 and sid getting 89… if sid only plays 60 games
Latest-greatest
Sid has hit the point where most people are taking his greatness for granted
useless_99
Oh my gooooood ESPN said whaaaaat, wooooow, you knooooow, it is sooooo interestiiiiing, how I literally do not care at all what those spoiled gallons of 1% milk think about hockey
R3alkitt3en
These ESPN people seem to know a lot about hockey. The article says he will score 90/89 points.
29 Comments
Embarasse is a bit strong. 89 Points is still good, but I doubt he only gets 89 and I also doubt Bedard gets 90. And anyway ESPN points predictions are complete trash. They predicted Marchand to have 46 points… Marchand could come back from hip surgery in the middle of the season again and make more than 46 points.
Bedard won’t sniff 90 points.
Crosby will out point Bedard.
Jeebus! Can’t they wait until the kid has played even one shift in the NHL?!?
Crosby was a 100 point player at 18 and McDavid was point a game in what was the dead puck era 2.0, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Bedard but up 90+
ESPN. ‘Nuff said.
Can we stop giving a shit about ESPN? They know nothing and care nothing of hockey.
more like they embarrassed themselves
Pants in a bunch over ESPN?!? C’mon boys – you are better than that.
For the record, my #2 team is the ‘Hawks – and I don’t think there’s a chance in Hades Bedard outpoints Crosby.
Kid hasn’t played a game…
Everyone who regularly follows hockey knows this isn’t going to be the case if Crosby stays healthy. I feel like 65 points with a high of 70s is a more realistic projection for Bedard but I guess we’ll see in seven months
Espn doesn’t know anything about hockey
Espn also had Marchand around 40 points…
Wait until you see that they projected Slafkovsky (55 points) to get more points than Marchand (46).
I’m glad they embarrassed him, keep it going 😎
Crosby had 102 points in his rookie season.
With what support will Bedard hit 90 points? Chicago is a hockey hellscape right now.
Bedard will be fantastic, but let’s be realistic 60-70 points is most likely and still fantastic for a rookie
When did ESPN find out about hockey?
Weird, I look at it more like espn embarrassing themselves
Bedard is going to be good but no way he passes Crosby just based on the fact of teammates.
It’s Espn… I’m surprised they know there are other sports besides basketball and Yankees baseball.
Can we all agree that maybe ESPN should put down the hockey and just walk away before they hurt themselves?
Chicago has 13 nationally televised games this season. All because of Bedard. Gotta get the hype machine going early.
Espn is shit for hockey. They spend more time on fantasy football.
RemindMe! 8 months
I could see bedard getting 90 and sid getting 89… if sid only plays 60 games
Sid has hit the point where most people are taking his greatness for granted
Oh my gooooood ESPN said whaaaaat, wooooow, you knooooow, it is sooooo interestiiiiing, how I literally do not care at all what those spoiled gallons of 1% milk think about hockey
These ESPN people seem to know a lot about hockey. The article says he will score 90/89 points.