@Blackhawks de Chicago

[Athletic] La diffusion des Blackhawks de Chicago classée 31e par les fans


[Athletic] La diffusion des Blackhawks de Chicago classée 31e par les fans


DynoDynoDyno

12 Comments

  1. GoldWhale

    Pang sucked too if we’re being entirely honest. He and Vosters have no chemistry, Pang’s commentary isn’t what it was prior either. Vosters has a great voice and tone but still isn’t good at the play. Call me crazy but Chelios was the most consistent in the booth last year.

  2. Such a shame after we were treated for so long with Pat & Edzo.

  3. WarmBedards

    I think the person that Vosters had the most chemistry with was Stu Grimson.

  4. EddyTheDesigner

    Id love Wiedeman and Pang together. I didn’t see him moving from the radio both though

  5. three_valves

    You can’t put all the blame on Pang. Vosters is a mess. He has a good voice but he is a baseball announcer trying to do hockey. He has almost no clue about the game.

  6. Foolsauce420

    At no time this season was it more apparent than when Kaner scored in overtime at the UC. The Red Wings call from Mickey and Ken made that an eternal hockey moment. Vosters lost me for good that day unfortunately.

  7. Repulsive-Office-796

    We had such a good duo for years which made watching a bad team somewhat tolerable.

Write A Comment

Pin