Regardez l’attaquant des Jets de Winnipeg, Cole Perfetti, tire un coup de feu dans le gant du gardien de but de St. Louis Blues Jordan Binnington, conduisant à une longue revue des officiels avant que l’appel ne se tiendra finalement. ———————————– https://www.facebook.com/sportsnet https://twitter.com/sportsnet https://www.instagram.com/sportsnet/ https://www.tiktok.com/@sportsnet ———————————– #nhl
@Blues de Saint-Louis
25 Comments
Was that a goal? Obviously, but can we all at least give binner his flowers? That was a hell of an effort
Jets lost by 5 goals. Who cares if this 1 went in.
Terrible decision by Toronto that was a goal
anyone with normal depth perception calls that in – so what if it was waved off – get refs with some backbone
Definitely looks like it should of been a goal, but not sure it would of mattered, Jets got spanked.
No goal. It’s simple
I knew they weren't going to call it a goal as soon I saw it
Being a diehard Blues fan since the 67-68 season, Winnipeg got robbed on that call
Not controversial
If you can't 100% see the puck is across the line , it is no goal
The puck was visibly 90% across the line but that 10% of glove webbing made it unable to be a goal.
Okay for the slow kids in the back:
Yes, the puck was probably in, but since the officials called it a no-goal at first the NHL and the officials have to prove beyond a doubt that the puck clearly crossed the line.
There just isn't a camera angle that gives them that definitive answer.
NHL logic: We know the puck is in the glove. We know the glove is in the net. We don’t know for sure if the puck is in the net.
That's a goal all day long
And people say games aren't fixed hmmmm
Its only hard to tell if you have a poor logic skills and poor spatial reasoning skills.
That is the most rig goal ever you can see that puck cross the goal line above the glove
Bad bad call terrible reffing.
I'm not a Jets fan, but it's looking like the nhl did it again
THAT IS 100% A GOAL. DONT LISTEN TO BLUES FANS.
The puck was 100% in. Unfortunately, with the call being 'no goal' it completely killed the Jets momentum. Would have been a completely different game if that had counted.
The puck is in the net
That's a goal. Doesn't surprise me that the NHL got it wrong though.
I don't understand how we still don't have enough new technology to determine that. In Fifa, they have laser tracing and digital recreation of a ball crossing or not the goal line. Yet they have digital advertisement overlay. Couldn't even bother to invest in higher frame rates cameras jesus christ.
horseshit
Was a good goal , definitely a momentum changer in the game blowing that call . Looked conclusive enough to me
0:39 It looks like it could be in from this angle when the puck rolls up the glove.
Binnington is covering the goal line with his pad (smart) and we can’t see where the puck is in the glove. There’s no objective way to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.