@Canucks de Vancouver

La vérité sur la défense des Canucks …



La partie 2 de mes Canucks de Vancouver 2024–25 L’aperçu de la saison est là, et cette fois, nous plongeons dans la défense. Quinn Hughes peut-il réellement atteindre la barre des 100 points? Cette ligne bleue est-elle finalement une force au lieu d’une faiblesse? Et la combinaison de Hughes, un noyau de défense plus profond, et Thatcher Demko dans le net seront-ils suffisants pour transporter les Canucks dans les séries éliminatoires?

16 Comments

  1. Hughes will flourish if Foote doesn't insist upon the 13 shots a game dump and chase snooze fest system as Tocchet.

  2. May I suggest orcas swimming on one of the back computers? I think it would be a nice touch actually

  3. I think Demko should play 2 games to Lankys 1 game. After all, Demko is getting paid more than Lanky, doesn't seem right have them both play the same amount of games.

  4. Honestly, was watching a guy talk about how marcus can be super offensive if given the chance and having hronek on his pair could lead to 2 dominant blue lines

    This can also result is taking pressure off and limitting his minutes.

  5. Coaching staff is definitely my biggest concern aswell! Excited to hear your thoughts it next video

  6. Partly why I think Hronek hasn't gotten 10+ goals in a season is due to how inaccurate that shot can be. Add to the fact that Hughes, last season, decided to dash in solo more times than I've ever seen him throughout his career up to last season goes to show that Hughes didn't feel like he could trust his teammates to make the best play. I hope that changes this upcoming season, resulting in more offensive contributions from the rest of the team.

  7. I dont think the canucks should trade any of there young d in a few years when Wallinder, Mancini and D-petey are ready to be top 4
    Do you think they should continue moving hronek for offensive help
    Also ppl didnt like the fact they traded 1st round pick for mp3

Write A Comment

Pin