D-Petey + Conor Garland + Lekkerimäki pour Luke Hughes … Qui a dit non? #canucks #njdevils

11 Comments

1. 

   @gusbradley3846 5 mois ago

   Can they RFA offer sheet Luke and sign him to a contract that expires with Jack’s then sign Quinn to a contract that expires at the same time giving the Hughes brothers the opportunity to sign massive deals with whoever they want? That’s Quinn’s incentive to resign in Vancouver.
   Then you get 4-5 years to convince them to play here or maybe trade L & Q in the last year as a package or just for what you can in return.

2. 

   @AndrewGibson-n8c 5 mois ago

   Get rid of EP 40 for Pete sake

3. 

   @jaschan2006 5 mois ago

   D-Petey, Lekkerimaki, and Garland for Luke Hughes? That is an overpay. D-Petey and Garland seems fair

4. 

   @Trumpisadick 5 mois ago

   Get serious!

5. 

   @fittobetiedyed5315 5 mois ago

   I would trade #40 for a bag of pucks.

6. 

   @etic9108 5 mois ago

   If you're trading for one Hughes, then you're trading both. It would be the king ransom for them both. Multiple 1sts etc

7. 

   @colinpoint1862 5 mois ago

   Nobody can afford all three brothers. if they do manage it, then they become the Toronto maple leafs.

8. 

   @jeremie2249 5 mois ago

   EP40 at his best is a 100 point player, with selke potential. Luke is left handed same as Quinn. This is junk

9. 

   @LeeMatson-p4v 5 mois ago

   That’s sickening

10. 

    @bateman4089 5 mois ago

    Absolutely not

11. 

    @coreymcewen8737 5 mois ago

    Dumb trade. Dont try to force some last minute desperate “keep Hughes” trade when ultimately I don’t think that would really work. Quinn might even see that as a panic move and not trust Alvin. That s not evening mentioning that we would loose out on three good players too