« Le ‘comprends-tu vraiment l’exercice’ pivote sur un échange de Conor Garland… il y aura un moment dans sa prolongation où ce n’est pas un bon contrat, alors prends de l’avance » #Canucks https://twitter.com/sekeresandprice https://www.facebook.com/SekeresandPrice https://www.tiktok.com/@sekeresandprice https://www.youtube.com/sekeresprice https://www.instagram.com/sekeresandprice 📧 live@sekeresandprice.com 📲 778-402-9680 https://www.sekeresandprice.com/ https://www.rinkwidevancouver.com #Canucks #VancouverCanucks #NHL #Hockey
@Canucks de Vancouver
7 Comments
But do the Canucks have anyone who works as hard as Garland?
I’d like to keep him around just to teach the kids that. Like you said, he’s middle six, we’re not keeping him for points, we’re keeping him cuz he’s a work horse and will (hopefully) teach the next gen to be work horses – winning, losing, in contention or not… when you’re on the ice, you’re give 100%.
Agreed. It’s not time to be nice anymore. He doesn’t have no trade protection, means he’s got to go.
Jake and Brock do, so they get a say in what happens. If they want to stay, they stay. But Garland can get you real pieces back and he doesn’t.
Love him, but the man’s got to go.
If the thought is to move your hardworking culture guys and keep the overpaid, under producers, then he’s your man.
I think Garland has earned a spot on the rebuild. We do still have to put a team out there. Draft picks can’t suit up
Buy low sell high. Canucks have been burned, as other teams have, on signing again players at market, to term. Just get the picks and sign a checker out of college or something.
Agree. Look at other teams, you are trading away a long term contract, get some picks, then open up the cap space to get some bad short term, expiring contracts plus picks to your way. Ilya Mikheyev is the perfect example.
You need some vets, and from reports he is good in the room. I would you listen if the offer blows you away.