@Flames de Calgary

L’intérêt des Canadiens de Montréal pour Nazem Kadri s’est refroidi!



Rejoignez cette chaîne pour avoir accès à des avantages : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCx7N63HCTBWijHpI-qphK3A/join Les Canadiens de Montréal refroidissent-ils leur intérêt pour Nazem Kadri avant la date limite des échanges dans la LNH en 2026 ? Dans cette vidéo, nous détaillons les dernières informations privilégiées et ce que cela signifie pour la stratégie de développement et de constitution de l’effectif de Montréal en séries éliminatoires. Selon des sources de la ligue, les Canadiens ont vérifié le centre des Flames de Calgary Nazem Kadri plus tôt dans la saison, et il n’a pas Montréal sur sa liste de non-échange, ce qui signifie qu’un accord était possible. Mais à mesure que la saison avançait et que des éléments internes comme Oliver Kapanen, Michael Hage et l’ajout de Phillip Danault émergeaient, les discussions autour de Kadri se sont considérablement calmées. 📊 Dans cette vidéo, nous couvrons : • Pourquoi Montréal était lié à Kadri en premier lieu 🧐 • Ce qui a changé et pourquoi l’intérêt s’est refroidi 🔥 • Ce que cela signifie pour la profondeur centrale et les espoirs des Canadiens en séries éliminatoires 🏒 • Des équipes sont toujours mentionnées comme prétendants potentiels à Kadri 📈 Ne manquez pas la date limite des échanges et ce qui pourrait arriver après la pause olympique — Kadri pourrait encore être un nom à surveiller ! ⏱️ 👇 Faites-le moi savoir dans les commentaires : 👉 Le Tricolore devrait-il raviver l’intérêt pour Kadri ? 👉 Ou d’autres cibles conviennent-elles mieux à Montréal ? #GoHabsGo #MontrealCanadiens #NazemKadri #NHLTradeDeadline #HabsRumors #HockeyTalk

42 Comments

  2. @rdnm600

    I just don't think you give up prime assets for a 36 year old Kadri, like Marco said the Habs are not a Cup conteder this year. Keep building up the prospect pool, you can never have enough high end prospects in your organization.

  8. @MrSharkster59

    If not Kadri for multiple reasons I'm fine with that but it would be nice to have a younger player who fits Nazim's profile. A tough C with grit who can score.

  11. @Deke1

    36 year old on a down year, maybe not a down year, maybe age is catching up with him, and he's maybe more of a third line center and not a top six center, I'd rather not give up prime prospects and draft picks for an aging center with a long term deal…..if Kadri was 28, then yeah I would, but I think MTL trades Laine and stands pat for the year with what they have…I see a possible big trade in the summer depending on how Hage works out if he gets some playing time after Michigan season ends

  12. @pimpvache

    Don’t want Kadri. Not because he wouldn’t be effective – but we aren’t ready to honestly contend. Our defense is still inconsistent. Goaltending not ready. Not time to make “contender” rental trades yet.

  13. @Lec_Seberc08

    Kadri MIGHT be a good fit alongside Suzuki and Cole if there is salary retention. Can take faceoffs on his strong side, good puck retriever, defensively responsible.

    That said, I don’t see it happening.

  14. @raymondspruance

    I suspect that Hughes will largely rely on internal moves to improve the team. Any external moves will be modest. Both short and medium term, the greatest improvement will come from the growing impact of the team's current young players (Hutson, Demidov, Slafkovsky , Kapanen, etc.) and the anticipated arrival of Montreal's heralded prospects ( Hage, Engstrom, Zharovsky, Fowler, Beck, Mooney, Paupanekis, etc.). The Canadiens' true window will start in 2027/2028, when a number of the team's older, increasingly unproductive players are finally removed from the roster. I think Hughes understands that the team is on the cusp of transforming itself from the status of competitive to contender and that any of the expensive proposed transactional options that are endlessly bandied about will make little difference in achieving a quicker transformation.

  16. @timcox3474

    I REALLY don't want an over the hill ex-Leaf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And it's a horrific contract!!!

  21. @seancarriere7069

    Jason Robertson is the move. Age appropriate with size, completes the first line for the next 6 years. He's everything they've said their looking for

  22. @IronSikh44

    I am intrigued on whether there’s any smoke behind Habs interest in a player like Robert Thomas. That’s a guy you move some good pieces for. Could something like Kapanen, Xhekaj, D prospect and a draft pick work in a trade for Thomas?

  23. @canuck_gamer3359

    This is not at all complicated to figure out, as you mentioned. Kadri is 36. This team is a year or 2 away from being a serious contender, so obviously that potential move makes little sense. Could I see them adding a veteran center when they are ready for a deep run? Absolutely. But that time is not now.

  24. @DarkMatterEclipse

    This team is not a contender yet. Danault wasn't acquired for production but his acquisition pretty much negates the "2C" talk unless they find a super bargain. They'll roll with Kapanen. If anything, it would be a gritty top 6 winger. Danault is there as a defensive/faceoff specialist to lead the young guns in that aspect. Given the right bait, Hughes will make a big move. He has to make a numbers move too.

  26. @malmacian_crunch2641

    Lafreniere. What's the cost to pry him away from the NYR? I think he would blossom under MSL, along side Nick and Cole. Would the Xhekaj Bros. be enough? Plus Dach, maybe?

  29. @sebsaavysworld8469

    Not a cup contender at the moment but you could say not far off, They are arguably the 2nd best team in the East, Other then Tampa who can you say for sure would beat Montreal in a playoff series in the East, Not Carolina. 6th best team in the league. Colorado, Dallas, Vegas and Minnesota are better then Montreal. So if Montreal made a big trade with the Blues and Added another number one center in Robert Thomas and big right shot D Colton Parayko, Or a top 6 forward to play with Suzuki and Caufield and the big right shot D Are they a Cup contender then?

  32. @StevenMulawka

    I would say the topic of category coming to Montreal should be is dead, dead dead that would be an absolutely ridiculous trade Kari’s way too old, but take the first and a good prospect for that no way

  33. @Smileymtl1

    For the love of god please DO NOT trade for Kadri, he does not fit in out timeline and it's clear he is on the decline this year

  34. @fearedlegend

    My prediction is Habs trade Engstrom, Kapanen and a first round pick. They will have to get rid of Laine with retention and do some cap gymnastics to get Robert Thomas. They better not trade Zharovsky or Hage or Fowler. Strubble and Xheqaj have little value and Reinbacher is dropping like a stone.

  35. @OldmountainmanQC

    The Kadri interest should have been like our current winter. Cold and snowy and not exciting in any way. Forget him PLEASE. he's not a part of this rebuild.

  36. @myyke65

    But with the situation this year, the Canadians are contenders to get out of the conference…

  37. @MrVenom-iu9rs

    As it should, we don't need kadri, we don't need to win the cup this year. Laine was a bad trade let's not make another. Dach has a little longer leash but not by much. It's rather them get a top d grinder to sure up the defence and pk.

  38. @tchevrier

    There is no way Hughes is interested in Kadri. He doesn't fill any need. They don't need a centre. They already have a logjam on the forward lines. He's 35 years old with a cap hit of $7M for the next three years.

Write A Comment

Pin