[Gambatese] Une analyse statistique des malheurs défensifs des Diables en matière de déplacement de rondelle
—
JoopNJD
@Devils du New Jersey
[Gambatese] Une analyse statistique des malheurs défensifs des Diables en matière de déplacement de rondelle
—
JoopNJD
2 Comments
This is going to sound nit-picky, but I’m intrigued by Nemec’s chance generation. How is chance generation defined? I’m assuming it is successfully completing a pass to another player, who then shoots the puck where it is either on target, off target, or blocked? I’m assuming it doesn’t take into account when a player doesn’t shoot from a good position, when a pass isn’t completed, or a shot from a rebound?
Nemec being 9th percentile is insane to me. Whilst a contributing factor, it feels like saying just as a product of being hemmed in is missing part of the picture. Are there any Nemec passing stats?
The thing with this guy is that he never acknowledges that we have tons of money and draft capital tied up in puckmoving dmen…More than most teams, and we’re supposed to add more there with the weakness at forward? I have no problem with the egghead stuff but the practical solution it pops out for roster wise is this it’s incredibly silly. You don’t just plant an improved 3rd pair puckmover in our system and then those fancies just apply to your team with no drawback. He even says we have 3 guys who are or should high level at puckmoving. Compare that to any roster. Kovacevic is a bit of a dolt but he’s not the reason this year has gone awry in his limited time. Dillon is bad bc he just doesn’t do it and lets the OFD on the pair take all of that role. I think the biggest issue with analytics is guys think you can plug in a guys analytics to another team. We’re 40 times better served getting offense out of forwards and improving the puckmoving from within. Stop being last at finishing in the league. The forwards need to do that not the D