La performance de Kiefer Sherwood n’a pas répondu aux attentes fixées par GMMG au moment de son acquisition. Si les Sharks de San Jose envisageaient un échange, quel serait un retour réaliste pour Sherwood ? Partagez vos réflexions sur la valeur potentielle et l’adéquation pour d’autres équipes. Rejoignez le club quotidien Locked on Sharks All-Access pour un contenu spécial destiné aux fans les plus inconditionnels des Sharks de San Jose : https://lockedonsharks.supercast.com/ Suivez et abonnez-vous sur toutes les plateformes de podcast… 🎧 https://lockedonpodcasts.com/podcasts/locked-on-sharks/ Locked On NHL League-Wide : chaque équipe, fantasy, espoirs et plus 🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnNHL #NHL #Requins #SanJoseSharks
10 Comments
Flip him
Chernyshov is miles better
No way he lost half of his trade value
There's about a 0% chance Grier is getting back what he paid for Sherwood.. don't overpay him, just take the L and move on.
Would be a sick move to flip.
Package him for Whitecloud, Schneider, or Drysdale
A late second round defensive prospect.
Just keep him. Why even try anything? When you have given away how much you did. $$$$
Flip him back to Vancouver for 2 second round picks, and throw in Nick Leddy and Carey Price
I mean, small sample sizes and perhaps unfair, but it’s hard to make a case right now that Sherwood has fit here at all. Arguably he has done the one thing no one in the NHL has been able to thus far, which is stifle Macklin Celebrini. He has 0 points and four minor penalties in 4 games, comically TWICE getting called for goalie interference. It’s not exactly a case for handing out the deal he wants. I’d flip him at this point. If they can get a late first from a cup contender or somehow an early second from a team that has someone else’s pick, you could at least save face and call it “trading up” the draft picks. That failing, getting anything back and mitigating the loss is better than him not fitting for a month, maybe not even making the playoffs, and then having him walk.
I was never high on this trade to begin with, mostly because a rental was not where this team is at in the rebuild, and a forward was not on the team’s need list to begin with, and I didn’t even think extending him was an obvious win given the young forward depth in the pipeline. What the team needs is a defenseman. That was true then. It’s still true now. And handing a $5mil AAV to another forward is not getting that defenseman. Unfortunately he’s only going to get 5 games here before the deadline, and while the small sample size is unfair (come back from injury on a new team, play one game and then sit for 2 weeks is hardly ideal), I really have not seen anything to change my mind here. The trade was always a bad idea. GMMG should not have done it. At this point flipping him for something back mitigates the disaster at least.