Un échange impliquant Nazem Kadri pourrait-il rapporter à Calgary un package comme nous l’avions imaginé dans cet échange hypothétique ?
@Flames de Calgary
Un échange impliquant Nazem Kadri pourrait-il rapporter à Calgary un package comme nous l’avions imaginé dans cet échange hypothétique ?
2 Comments
Not sure of the scouting on Nate Danielson. But at first glance he fits what the Flames would want. JT Compher is a bit of a money move. Maybe Calgary could flip him if they could keep some of the five plus he’s getting. But they sure don’t need another guy on the LW nor a guy his age. The draft picks, two firsts, and a second, are always nice to see.
Now the return?
Kadri as a dead line move, because of the term, without retention is a second and a prospect. They only move him to a real contender as a thank you to the player. To the right team, or with salary retained he might be the difference of not getting past a game seven, and a cup. With retention they wouldn’t move him for less than a first, and prospect. Why would they? He’s an asset to development.
Coleman (again) has been a good soldier for the Flames. His family likes the city. The only move I see Calgary making for him, has him going to Dallas. No matter what the return is short of McDavid.
Weegar is not a guy the team has even shopped. Think Rasmus Andersson package and a move is still unlikely. But that was a first, a second that could become a first, Whitecloud that would likely get you another first if flipped, and a prospect.
All the players on this list are top trade pieces that the Flames are not in a hurry to move off of.
All of them together; assuming retention of half for Kadri, and the understanding that Colman would be unlikely to say yes anyway; looks like three firsts, a roster player of value, and a top prospect.
Making this a hard pass from the Flames.
nah no thanks on kadri, guy is old and expensive contract