@Canadiens de Montréal

#WeNeedToSaveSoldierLane


#WeNeedToSaveSoldierLane


Effective-Goose-7835

26 Comments

  1. AutoModerator

    Hi there! It looks like you’ve posted an image. If this image is from an article, please provide a source. If it’s a meme, please ignore this comment. Thanks!

    *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Habs) if you have any questions or concerns.*

  2. jadenspan

    Fuck me man just run Hutson Dobson and pray for the rest

  3. dessanct

    So we’re continuing to put Lane on his offside, but just giving him a worse partner each game?

    The difference in his play on the offside to strong side is like a 30+ point pace.

    We need to stop this and just run a weaker 3rd pair, which we only play 8-10 minutes anyways.

    Hutson/Dobson

    Matheson(or Guhle)/Carrier

    Whoever/whenever

  4. -Son_of_Thror-

    stupid ass fumble from the coaching staff to keep playing Lane on his offside. Makes zero sense to hinder your best D man to accomodate a healthy scratch ffs

  5. LeRedneckDuPlateau

    Caliss pas Struble encore avec Hutson -_-

    Pourquoi on ne rappelle pas Reinbacher?

  6. CarlSK777

    I get it, MSL is trying to find balance with a flawed defense lacking a proper RHD for the 2nd pair but Hutson-Dobson is your best pair and they should stay together for the foreseeable future. When this team becomes a contender they’ll be the ones leading the defense

  7. That second pair is going to be -3 tonight easily.

  8. workhardXplayhard

    Ugh, I don’t get it. The guy who’s in and out of the lineup, plays around 10 minutes/game, and is a defensive liability ends up on the second pair with an offensive D who’s known to take risks, which can sometimes lead to 2-on-1s. Plus, let’s play hutson on his offside, sure

  9. kingkellam

    Guhle-Carrier on the bottom pair is a good decision. I’ll take half a win over running it back

  10. OnlyKeyISeeToDefeatU

    This coaching staff has proven to be slow to make necessary lineup changes

    Monty, Defence, Gallagher

    Some of these things should be sorted out well before game 60. Lots of points lost in connection with at least two of these

  11. KarateChopMittens

    Putting our worst D with Huston on his off side is a choice

  12. Am I misremembering or did Mike play the right side with Lane for a couple games last year?

  13. xaznxplaya

    Why the hell is Struble there in the first place)/?

  14. Longtimelurker2575

    Don’t understand why we don’t run Hutson/Dobson (firepower pairing) Matheson/Guhle (shutdown) and Xhekaj, Struble/Carrier (leftovers). Could even swap Guhle with Carrier if they struggle.

  15. So we’re serious enough about the playoffs to bench Monty, but somehow not serious enough to actually use Lane Hutson to the fullest. Right. riiiiight.

  16. OpenMouthKissedHorse

    Why does Marty hate one of the best defensive pairings in the league?

  17. jmoney_84

    I could be wrong, but didn’t Struble play on the right side with Hutson a few times last year with at least acceptable results?

  18. Hutson – Struble worked in the back half of last year. That’s the only thing I can think of to justify these pairings

  19. Holy fuck just run Hutson – Dobson it shouldn’t be this hard. Running Hutson on his offside with a plug on his left is just disrespectful. Why the fuck isn’t Reinbacher called up. He would have no trouble whatsoever of being better than Jayden Struggle.

  20. blondehairginger

    It makes sense for Guhle to get a reduced role for a while. He heavily relied on his skating and the lost mobility from the surgery is proving to be very difficult for him. I’m just waiting for him to build back his groin muscle with reps to go back to normal.

  21. thebestnames

    I wish we had Hutson-Dobson full time. One of the best defense pairs in the league.

  22. fortytwoanswers

    Hutson-Dobson

    Matheson-Reinbacher

    Guhle-Carrier

    do it.

  23. Effective-Goose-7835

    I know many people are against it, but we might need to recall Reinbacher sooner rather than later

Write A Comment

Pin