@Sénateurs d'Ottawa

Linus Ullmark arrête le tir de pénalité après que l’examen ait annulé le vainqueur de l’OT des Hurricanes



Regardez l’attaquant des Hurricanes de la Caroline Mark Jankowski voir son but gagnant annulé après un défi de hors-jeu, ce qui a conduit le gardien de but des Sénateurs d’Ottawa Linus Ullmark à arrêter Jordan Martinook sur un tir de pénalité qui a été récompensé après l’examen. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLo12SYwt93SQP81ntu8rz9QcAHTNQaFI3 Regardez les derniers moments forts des matchs de la LNH, présentant les meilleurs buts, arrêts, coups sûrs et moments clés du match de ce soir. Abonnez-vous pour rester au courant des faits saillants de la LNH, des meilleurs jeux et des récapitulatifs des matchs de toute la ligue tout au long de la saison. ———————————————- 📺 http://sportsnetplus.ca – Diffusez en direct sur Sportsnet+ 💻 http://www.sportsnet.ca – Plus de nouvelles et de faits saillants sur Sportsnet.ca https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVhibwHk4WKw4leUt6JfRLg https://www.youtube.com/@MLBxSPORTSNET https://www.youtube.com/@NBAxSPORTSNET https://www.facebook.com/sportsnet https://twitter.com/sportsnet https://www.instagram.com/sportsnet/ https://www.tiktok.com/@sportsnet https://www.snapchat.com/@sportsnet.sc ———————————————- #NHL #Hockey #Faits saillants

36 Comments

  1. Unbelievable being the players and coaches on the sens bench winning a review then you realize the delayed penalty the game will hinge on is actually a penalty shot.
    Foegeles face at the end was FR because how do you not crap yourself😭😭 PS goal and your down 2-0 the series.

  2. So an offside is not whistled down, an eventual goal is scored, but overruled because of the offside.
    However, the missed offside is still allowed when an infraction is made, leading to a penalty shot.
    HUH?

  3. Amazing game, great battles, poor officiating, nauseating listening to SN’s entire panel of fools, and especially Garry Galley. Long love TSN

  4. Ветеран Ульмарк конечно же могёт 🔥🔥🔥 По-моему это один из самых лучших вратарей современного НХЛ (топ10 уд точно)

  5. At three minutes and twelve (w/ decimals/ fractions of) seconds left of O.T., Staal (unfortunately) hestitated right then left w/ the puck due to his teamate about to enter the OTT zone and the puck was on the inside of the end of the blueline, while the CAR player's (down the middle) skate was fully across (w/ a slight gap between the skate and the outside of the blueline-OTT's zone).

    Courtesy of Google's YT playback speed settings, set at 25% within these highlights.

    *Edit: the offside was before the goal! :/
    …but Ully made his mark!

  6. Hey everyone,
    The rulebook says(37.2) than any penalty called during video review will be applied unless it's concluded that a goal was scored.

    Pretty much all contact sports handle this situation like this.

  7. Lotta people here gonna be eating crow once the explanation goes out. So many people think they know better than professionals.

  8. Ottawa should be 2-0 but ref helped Carolina I still believe Ottawa take it and win it in 6 or 7

  9. I guess the rule that ‘cancelled’ plays could still result in penalties is so that you don’t get a free chop at another player

  10. That was not offside 😂 what an absurd call, he had full control of the puck. Sens given the royal treatment by the refs tonight

  11. How can there be a penalty shot, when the game was offside?
    It's literally impossible, when looking at the rules!

    Wow, this league is corrupt.
    Beyond words!
    Seriously: I cannot think of a single "professional" league, that makes up rules however they feel like, to manipulate games like this.

    Meanwhile, the clear hooking against Batherson, in the dying seconds of the third?
    No penalty!
    The clear high-stick against Tkachuk, "this" period?
    No call!
    … but they call this light infraction against Ottawa, immediately?
    And, worst of all, "double down* on it, despite the offside, that made this i fraction inpisyible?
    Sure!

    It's sickening!
    Wonder, how much money they had on the Hurricanes!

  12. Schrödinger's Shot: if the play was offside, that guy was not in the zone legally. therefore, there was no chance to score. not a clear chance to score and no chance was taken away. THE CAT WAS DEAD never to be alive again. the time of the infraction is the time of the offside and that's false. the infraction happened after the offside but before the puck drop outside the zone. no one was in the zone (during the game). there was no time at which a scoring chance existed. there is no box. PS the hockey gods maintained universal balance anyway…

  13. thats weird . i feel like he shouldnt get a penalty shot. it was offside. that should nullify an attempt at a penalty shot.

Write A Comment

Pin