@Hurricanes de la Caroline

Faits saillants des matchs de la LNH | Predators contre Hurricanes, match 5 – 25 mai 2021



Jordan Staal a marqué en prolongation pour donner aux Hurricanes de la Caroline la victoire 3-2 dans le cinquième match contre les Predators de Nashville et prendre une avance de 3-2 dans la série.

49 Comments

  1. Fan of another team reporting in, just seeing the crowds again is amazing. Are we finally approaching the end of the apocalypse?!

  2. The goal was robbed from number 22 Pesce. Staal fanned on the tip and also fanned on the shot and Josi put it in his own net. Its easy to see at 0.25 speed. Please award the goal properly. Staal did NOT score that.

  3. I called it that Necas was gonna have a helluva game and help lead this team to victory. Also, Slavin should have 2 points from the game with either 2 assists or 1 goal, 1 assist (can’t tell if Fast or Staal tipped the puck in during that bs goaltender interference call).

  4. So that’s goaltender interference but Kesler grabbing cam Talbots pad in game 5 of the 2017 playoffs isn’t??? What a joke. Oilers robbed of that series.

  5. How was Carolinas 2nd goal, goalie interference?! That bogus decision nearly cost Carolina the game. Horrendous call. Made up for it with Necas beauty of a goal but we can't have terrible calls like that hampering the game.

  6. wtf is up with the refs? Why not just wear a Preds jersey and make it official

  7. Nashville's own player interferes with the goalie. Last time I checked, that didn't qualify as goalie interference.

  8. Someone tell me how 12,000 screaming fans is perfectly fine and "safe" yet going to 20,000 max capacity is completely untenable? How is the extra 8,000 people really that scientifically different?

    Pack the house. Enough of this 50-75% capacity that is only due to fear of being criticized. Florida has been having sold out events for months now. We have enough people vaccinated. Eventually we have to let people select which risks they're willing to accept.

  9. The broken maid mechanistically imagine because backbone putatively book as a exultant stool. inexpensive, squalid women

  10. This just in: the Zebras and the Predators lose in OT to the Whalers/Canes! 🤣🤣🤣

  11. Predators! This game was just hurriedly packed! That tell us the passing and receiving are not yet fully accomplished and based foundation. Come on guys! We have gotten to make this going. Coach! Please set positive reinforcements. Thank you! I am really hoping you will attain this round.

  12. I miss Matt duchene on avs but he is so irrelevant that the trade keeps getting better

  13. Leaf's fan here….
    Way to go Canes👍👍
    Talk about deserving the W after THAT mind-boggling, head scratching, anger inducing …… BLOWN call on the "We have Goalie interference, so No Goal"
    Mystery.?!? Lol
    Watched it several times and for the life of me I can't see How the ref determined that Carolina was responsible for the interference causing the No Goal call??
    Nothing worse than STILL getting it wrong, even with video replay?!?

  14. The officiating in this league will be the death of it lmao….. zero consistency from game to game.

  15. Here is my analysis of the Goalie Interference that no one is asking for:

    At 4:42 you can see Foegele's skate in the crease. At 4:44 the shot is released and his foot is out of the crease. I will note that his foot did not impede Saros. Saros elected to look to Slavin's direction of travel and thus leaned passed Foegele to gain sight of the puck. He made this election without any assistance or hindrance. Also at 4:44 Josi cross checks Foegele which may have assisted him leaving the crease. Foegele had been trapped in by Nashville #45. Essentially Foegele was stuck between Josi's cross check and the physical presence of #45 who was trying to clear Fast from the front of the net. The shot is enroute. The puck hits Staal's skate (pushing it back from force of shot and he recovers his balance by placing his skate back on the ice) and is NOT a kicking motion. Since Josi is attempting to clear Foegele, he impedes Saros' ability to come back to his left and the two collide. The call on the ice was a good goal.

    To overturn the call on the ice, there would have to be insurmountable evidence to the contrary. At best the two player's jerseys gently caressed one another prior to Josi's crease clear attempt (aka Incidental Contact). The goalie's crease did have a skate, but did not infringe upon Saros' ability to make a reasonable attempt at a save. Josi's presence did. Is it that because Foegele was present that Josi needed to be in position and that is why they called what they called? That's a dangerous precedent if that was the case. It isn't. What we have here is a VERY loose interpretation of incidental contact. A definition that is not contained in the spirit of the rule.

    The call on the ice should have been sustained and a two minute delay of game been assessed to Nashville.

    Of course we have the benefit of shrugging this off and saying no big deal, but this could very easily happen again to any team. Imagine the ire if the score had not changed. The Canes are not allowed to have fun. We get your message NHL. We have seen it in three of these 5 games now and in a fine for tripping. (Where is Forseberg's fine for tripping last night? He got caught napping in the neutral zone and tried to go knee to knee with a deliberate kick out)

    This was better than therapy. Go Canes!

Write A Comment

Pin