Piotr Kochetkov a réalisé un arrêt presque spectaculaire, mais un but a finalement été accordé.
—
Plastic-Sink9986
@Ligue nationale de hockey
Piotr Kochetkov a réalisé un arrêt presque spectaculaire, mais un but a finalement été accordé.
—
Plastic-Sink9986
30 Comments
I don’t think that should’ve counted
Ridiculous stop.
Great effort but the gloves looks mostly over the line in the last frame of the clip. Leafs still lost, and that’s all that matters.
How the fuck does this count but Silverbergs wrap around against Florida was no good? I know that was a while ago but wtf
I love the announcer, you cannot see the puck. Yet the announcer knows the puck is in the glove and goalie gives the ref the puck from his glove. The glove was over the line. Its a goal.
That pass from Domi is absolutely insane
Calgary would have another Stanley Cup if we had 4K TV in 2004.
Shouldn’t the play be dead at the point it goes over?
Saros stole Kane in similar way
[deleted]
The most almost save of all time
Should have worn a black glove
I’m sorry but under the rules. I do not understand why this was considered a goal.
Common sense tells you that in the glove it crossed the line. However, you cannot see the puck anymore, so you can’t see one hundred percent if it crossed the line or not.
It was called no goal.
I’m sorry but once again the officiating doesn’t follow the letter of the Rules just makes it up as they go along.
I’m not a fan if either one of these teams. I don’t care either way.
As a minor league (ECHL) I had to make one of these calls against the home team…beer shower ensued.
PK has been playing well since he’s been made the main goalkeeper. Hope he keeps it up
There was a play like this earlier on the season that they called no goal where it was way more obvious that the puck had crossed the line, the broadcasters were litterally drawing a line to show where the puck was and showing the white space then it was called no goal. Shit makes no sense
That entire glove is in the net. That’s a goal any day of the week.
That looked like a save to me, no need to microanalyse the tape. I hate how this becomes a court case instead of just accepting that he had it in his glove above the line. Looking for black behind the line inside his glove, when it’s that close, is a waste of time and momentum. It resets the whole game unfairly, Kochetkov had it. Keep the cameras and litigation out of the game as much as possible. In the spirit of the game, that was a save.
That’s BS! Tie goes to the goalie. Fantastic series of saves there
I had a perfect view of this from my seat.
Couldn’t believe he got there, he just had too much momentum going back across he couldn’t keep that glove out of the net.
Unbelievable effort.
This is such an easy no goal call.. i hate video review
That wasn’t all the way across.
That puck did cross the goal line. I did not hear a whistle. That would be the only factor. But that is a human thing. The whistle should go when the motion is stopped: when the puck is inside the goal.
That is a big goalie glove. All of the places that could hold a puck crossed all the way over the line.
Before you make up your mind about the goal, check out the other angles cause you can definitely see the puck in the net lol
This video shows a great save. If you think differently, you are new to watching the nhl
That deserved the save lol how close was that… wow
“Almost”.
Damn goal cost me my 2 point spread. Lol
it seems ridiculous to call this a goal just because the glove passed the line, the puck is contained within his glove not loose in the net.
its whatever but seems like a ill willed call
Kochetkov has possession of the puck in his glove before the puck crosses the line. Shouldn’t the play be dead at that point? Before the puck crosses the line?