Explication officielle de la LNH sur la vérification croisée de Sam Bennett.
—
BurgerNugget12
@Ligue nationale de hockey
Explication officielle de la LNH sur la vérification croisée de Sam Bennett.
—
BurgerNugget12
35 Comments
DiD nOt pReVeNt SwAymAn fRoM pLaYiNg HiS pOsItIon
Bobo could have made the 2 goals called back in game 5 vs Tampa WTF NHL losing fans every bullshit call
So a guy laying on you doesn’t prevent you from moving? I think we found a new strategy to score A LOT more goals
Translation: our heads were too far up our asses to see the goalie interference.
Love that they refer to the cross check as a shove
The ONLY slightly reasonable explanation for this call is that Swayman was flat on his keister with no real way to get back to the other post. Still, Bennett dumped him right on top of the goalie, with a hit in the back, when he never touched the puck. There’s a couple calls to be made there, unless the league actually wants a NY FLA match-up in an election year. Gotta love legalized sports gambling!
sure
Come on Boston fans… Quit acting like you ever had a chance to win this series.
Current director of Hockey Operations Colin Campbell’s son is the current AGM of the Panthers. Check out his history or corruption and then judge this series.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/519838-irresponsible-media-the-colin-campbell-saga-that-has-been-swept-under-the-rug
NHL’s explanations should be printed on toilet paper so everybody can wipe their ass with them…they will never admit fault or say our refs can only read braille
Officially that is first class garbage bullsh_t. That’s an opinion not fact. Number 1 it’s interference on Coyle. Then Coyle pushed against goalie. Who the f_ck is working Toronto. Wrong wrong wrong. The NHL is embarassing. Ineptitude. Get your crap together and get better.
Yall emailing them too? 😂
BECAUSE he wasn’t making that save either way.
Keep the salt flowing this is amazing guys.
Cats just tougher. It’s a fact, embrace it and move on with your life.
Draft Kings is obviously taking bets on video reviews too.
Everyone being upset at the no Goalie Interference is directing their ire in the wrong direction. The NHL decided to stick by their refs on this one because they missed the cross-check. The strategy of cross-checking the opposition defenseman into their goalie is not going to suddenly be a new strategy but because the refs missed it and you cannot challenge the missed penalty the NHL handcuffed itself into having this be the response.
Is it wrong? Yes 100% it should not be a goal but not because of goalie interference because that is not how the rules are set up and if you need to expand the challenge to missed calls creating the goal that would have to be voted upon in the future. Until then while again I cannot stress enough it was wrong it also was allowed to come back this way because the NHL backed their stripes on the non-call and the result of that non-call was not goalie interference by the letter of the rule.
That’s a funny way of spelling cross check.
Postgame commentary: « maybe the league thought there wasn’t enough contact there. » (paraphrasing)
NHL: « LOL nah that ain’t it, Bennett *totally* shoved Coyle on top of Swayman but Swayman still coulda stopped it if he wanted to. »
Fuckin’ 🤡 league.
Still can’t believe « shove » and « subsequent contact » still lead to a goal
That no-call was terrible.
Absolutely hilarious. He croas checks him into sway and shoots the puck immediately after, you can literally see swayman try to play his position and be unable to because theres a fucking player in the way.
Joke
You know what? I hate all things Boston, and I agree that the Bruins got fucking hosed here.
If this call isn’t a fluke, plays like these might take the league by storm — I fully expect the other 31 teams to start abusing this. Being able to interference launder like this takes away so many defensive options on the penalty kill.
You’d need to keep a few feet from the crease to make sure if you’re shoved on the defensive, you have enough space to not hit your own goalie giving the offence heaps of space to pass through the slot.
Kind of nuts that Toronto green-lit this.
That explanation was a stretch, and terribly dishonest. “Don’t believe your eyes”.
I mean if this is allowed. All players should just be knocking other players right in to the goalie to clear space for an easy goal. Seems like a solid plan for everyone moving forward.
The rules are clearly set up to disallow goals in this situation: 69.1 says that a defender pushed by an attacking player counts as an extension of the attacking player. 69.3 says that contact other than incidental contact in the crease is not allowed
This was more than incidental contact, it should be no goal.
Was Swayman likely to stop the goal? No. But he was pushing off the post to get into a better position. He could’ve tried to dive for it, get a stick out, whatever… instead he’s pushed back towards the left post.
Such bullshit
lol
Great precedent. Might as well raise the net 10 feet, lose the sticks and let the offense set picks and create lanes for the puck carrier to slam dunk it for 2..boiii
Translation: Sportsbet told us that the goal needed to be good, so we did it.
This translation brought to you by sportsbet
NHL corrupt situation room
Shove = Cross check
The NHL has now officially been corrupted by the gambling world.
My favorite part of this is how we’ll see an identical situation play out tonight with the exact opposite ruling.