@Hurricanes de la Caroline

Accord ou pas d’accord ? Necas échange à Calgary


J’ai vu cette proposition d’échange sur Les écrivains du hockey quand je cherchais des rumeurs commerciales et que j’ai pensé que c’était une idée intéressante.

Les Flames de Calgary reçoivent :

  • RW, Martin Necas (droits RFA)
  • C, Jesperi Kotkaniemi (six ans restants, 4,82 millions de dollars AAV)
  • Choix de 2e ronde 2024 (Caroline)
  • Choix de 4e ronde 2025 (Caroline)

Les Hurricanes de la Caroline reçoivent :

  • G, Jacob Markstrom (il reste deux ans, 6 millions de dollars AAV)
  • LW/RW, Andrew Mangiapane (il reste un an, 5,8 millions de dollars AAV)
  • Choix de 2e ronde 2024 (via les Stars de Dallas)
  • Choix conditionnel de 3e ronde 2025 (Calgary)

Accord ou pas d’accord ? Je dirais un accord si Markstrom avait quelques années de moins. Je ne sais tout simplement pas si échanger contre un gardien de but du même âge que celui que nous devons échanger est la meilleure idée. Peut-être que cela peut être un pis-aller jusqu’à ce qu’il y ait de meilleures options ? Je préfère définitivement envoyer Necas vers l’ouest plutôt que vers Boston ou Philly, c’est juste l’âge de Markstrom et mon opinion un peu surfaite sur lui qui me font appréhender.


AndyBoBandy_

20 Comments

  1. Why not just send Aho and Jarvis as well since the scale is already broken in the Flames favor.

  2. SokkasBoomerang3

    This is fucking awful lol in my opinion ofc

    Maelstrom doesn’t move the needle at all, except for maybe backwards

    If we don’t get someone like Sharangovich included at minimum this is awful.

    Neither of their goalies are a need or that great, unless we get Markstrom to flip to NJ for like Dawson Mercer or something which would never happen.

  3. BudWeiserIII

    No deal. I’d do KK and a couple trades for Mang though. Just tired of getting people for only a year

  4. As said before. Markstrom is the same age as Fred and isn’t really an upgrade. Yes we get out of the KK contract but to me it seems like bringing in another older goalie and a downgraded winger. Personally don’t see the value in this one.

  5. Bucketen

    Maybe if we got Weegar back in this deal even if we had to add another pick. Otherwise doesn’t make any sense for us

  6. clemmytech

    Yea, that’s gonna to be a no for me dawg.

  7. Like17Badgers

    yes lets trade our 50 point forward and a guy on an off year for a 40 point forward and a goalie that’s 3 months younger than our current « probably retiring soon » goalie but has a .027 lower save, all so we can move back in the draft.

  8. The more of these trades I see the more I want to resign Necas

  9. EstablishmentNo5994

    This is a garbage proposal and doesn’t line up at all with the kind of return the team has said they’re going to require. Total waste of time

  10. No, this is just Calgary Flames fan fiction.

  11. nascar105

    I’m gonna miss Necas if we get rid of him…

  12. ludicrouspeedgo

    Let’s play a game called Calgary kicks Raleigh in the balls.

  13. notyomamasusername

    That’s a shit deal, No way

  14. AegonPaul

    No, not even close. I think we need to wrap our heads around keeping Necas if these are the offers we are gonna get.

  15. GhostITW

    So we get a goalie who is a mild at best upgrade over what we already have who is old and not that good. We got a small, undersized, forward who is older, overpaid, has scored over 20 goals exactly once in his career and has never come close to scoring as much as Necas has in a year, we drop down 2 spots in the 2nd round as well?

    What an absolute joke of a trade idea. That fact that we are even giving this post any publicity is insane to me.

Write A Comment

Pin