@Canucks de Vancouver

Les Canucks devraient inclure le défenseur Elias Pettersson dans un package commercial contre un centre top-2?



Les Canucks devraient-ils être disposés à inclure le défenseur Elias Pettersson dans un package commercial contre un centre top-2? @mattsekeres | @JustBlakePrice présenté par @Whistlergolf https://twitter.com/sekeresandprice https://www.facebook.com/sekeresandprice https://www.tiktok.com/@sekeresprice https://www.instagram.com/sekeresandprice 📧 live@sekeresandprice.com 📲 778-402-9680 https://www.sekeresandprice.com/ https://www.rinkwidevancouver.com #canucks #vancouvercanucks #nhl #hockey

23 Comments

  1. D-Petey is a future piece of this Canucks core and he is the closest thing to Chris Tanev that we've had since Chris Tanev left. Do NOT trade him.

  2. No brainer – McTavish is what we need. Our D is really good without DPetey and we have Mancinni and Willander coming also – we all agree DPetey is the real deal, but again McTavish might be better and he fits our requirements perfectly.

  3. You’re not trading any of the young defenceman.. that would be extremely dumb.

    Just go with the lineup you have now, see how you do and make the necessary trades before the trade deadline.

  4. That’s great, let’s trade a young gritty, physical d-man. How about another E. Pettersson #40.

  5. A physical willing to hit defenseman that is smart on how and when he checks, skates well and makes a decent first pass is invaluable for the canucks. They arent big and physical and will need that come playoffs if they are to make them.

  6. Of course you do… that's a rhetorical question! 2nd Line C's are VERY hard to come by; D-men are SO more available.

  7. I think a player and 2 prospects (Willander and Lekkerimaki) would do it. Hoglander? Garland? Thats the package that Anaheim would at least look twice at

  8. You trade Hoglander, Willander, and a 2027 first for McTavish. Pettersson is far too valuable to this Roster, backend to trade him.

Write A Comment

Pin