Le gardien de but des Rangers de New York Jonathan Quick, le capitaine JT Miller et l’attaquant Will Cuylle parlent avec les médias après la défaite de l’équipe contre les Red Wings de Détroit le 16 novembre. Chapitres : 0:00 Jonathan Quick 1:26 JT Miller 2:45 Will Cuylle » Abonnez-vous au NYR http://youtube.com/nyrangers?sub_confirmation=1 NYR ON SOCIAL Twitter » https://twitter.com/nyrangers Instagram » https://www.instagram.com/nyrangers/ Facebook » https://www.facebook.com/nyrangers/ TikTok » https://www.tiktok.com/@nyrangersofficial Application officielle » https://rangers.page.link/nyrangersapp Visitez le site MSG Sports » https://www.msgsports.com/
@Rangers de New York
19 Comments
Quick mad bc the Wings were playing until the final whistle… lmao
I was at the game The team did not support quickie at all. Pretty poor effort on home ice again
The Rangers are such a slow team. You need speed in this modern NHL and they have very little of it. This is gonna be another rough year. They are 30th in the league in goals scored
We refpucked out of a win.
We looked good all night except the last ten minutes.
Quickie saved us. He shoulda punched the ref 😅
Jonathan Quick should be getting more starts regardless of his age and Igor’s contract and 100% could be the starter for USA in the Olympics
OMG give me a break. It was AT THE BUZZER!! Rangers on the ice had no issue. I’d check Quick’s mental health after the BS
Quick is such a snowflake
He just overreacted. I think something during the game caused this.
The team left Quickie out to dry. More poor home play.
As a Wings fan I've always liked Quick – seeing him slide up and explode after the game ended was hilarious.
What a baby, "couple of seconds"??? Watch the replay, he shoots the puck about half a second after the horn goes, likely the thought was just in motion to shoot and he didn’t have time to react really when you're dead tired and just focused on doing the job… I can see that he COULD have had time to stop himself but it DEFINATELY wasnt "couple of seconds" like Quick try to justify it to be here… I'm a Red Wings fan obviously and i usually don't go to opponents teams site to post, but i just had to see what the heck Quick had to say after that brain fart of a behaviour… He is an amazing goalie and a shoe in HoFer and i respect the heck out of him but… That was just childish sore loser behaviour, not a good look at all…
EDIT: Also i gattu ask this question and try to be objective and situational if you can… Does anyone in here think Quick deserves a suspension since he actively left the bench in sole purpuse to pick a fight? I would say no at first, but the way Witkowski got 10 games suspension you can argue was simular situation (in Witkowski case he got slashed when he already had got into the bench and then goated into coming back out there when he got speared once he turned around, he actually tried to leave TWICE but got punched in the back of his head from the bench once he was about to leave after ref eventually told him to…)
What was Quick's reason, other then acting as a child? I know it's not exactly the same but hear me out… I just remember the conversation after the Witkowski thing happened (it was simular to the degree of what happened on the ice, which was not much, just a few players hugging it out and no real punches thrown) that these rules are enforced to avoid more then 5 players each on the ice fighting and these bench clear brawls from the 70/80s etc the "new NHL" don't want…
The Witkowski thing wasnt though from what i can remember that he was specifically "told to leave the ice" and after that he "choose" to ignore it and therefore it was a clear cut suspension? Which is the explanation i got after asking this question after the game last night… No, from what I remember and see watching back on it all, it was simply that he entered the ice as an "extra", it wasnt during any type of play… This happened during a TV commercial break and Witkowski was leaving the penalty box after he had ragdolled a Calgary player in a fight, and he had JUST stepped his skates onto the bench when someone standing on the ice (Tkachuk) cowardly took a shot at him (tapped him with his stick when he already was off ice) while yapping and challenged him… Here is the video and reasoning behind it, they first said it was a "gray area" and should not be a suspension, but it eventually was simply because he entered the ice in purpuse for altercation, that's it. —-> https://youtu.be/kn-UEQB-pVg?si=cZHnq2ezwS6hlt1c
So if Tkachuk would have had the balls to do that while he was still on the ice (meaning skating from the penalty box towards the bench), there would have been no suspension (which the Tkachuk rat likely knew and why he did it to goat a player with a heckuva less salary then him to get a suspension and a large part of his salary removed), right? That is the explanation i was given at the time from the Detroit broadcast group… That as soon as a player steps into the bench, you are not allowed to enter the ice in any altercation, the purpuse of this is again to avoid these bench clearing brawls…
Sure, it's not the very same situation but it kind of where in a way, no? The game was over, there is no play. Quick had no reason to leave the bench to start a fight? And don't give me the explanation "well why was Detroit team out on the ice", it's not the same… Players usually comes out on the ice after a game is over to go to the goalie and give him a pat, the goalie was already on the bench so… What reason did Quick have to go on the ice? He even removed his helmet before doing so looking for a fight… After the game ends and there is no goalie left on the ice, players just leave for their dressing rooms, which you do as the home team from the bench area, only the road team has to go on the ice to enter their part of the visiting team dressing room, which in most arenas are located on the other side of the rink (in the corner behind your goalie) that you have to skate out on the ice to enter…
So again, i understand people will be saying that these situations are wildly diffrent but think it COULD be applied while it obviously isnt the very exact scenario… I only remember how the suspension got explained to me and it was purely because you are not allowed to be in any scrums once you are on the bench, period. Which i interpret in this simply; once you have left the ice during a play, which in Witkowski case was the moment he stepped onto the bench from the box, that counted as leaving "the play on the ice", and in Quick's case he left "the play on the ice" when he got to the bench for an extra skater… Again, sure it's not the exact same situation but still i thought the Witkowski suspension was really, REALLY silly because he litterly just took a step on the ice to defend himself for a second because he was attacked and aggrevated, he didn't do it out of nowhere just to start crap, he got provoked into it from one of the leauges biggest agitators in Tkachuk… Quick had ZERO reason whatsoever to enter the ice when he was already on the bench and it was obviously with a purpuse when he even removed his helmet before it (getting ready to fight)…
Am i so far off based here in making the comparassion? I'll add this before i get jumped for being "soft" or whatever guys who still are living in the broadway bullies 70's days and think everything that doesn't completly kill a person on the ice should be allowed lol… I would NOT think this is worthy of a suspension IF the Witkowski one didn’t happen… But he got suspended for something really silly and i would argue that suspension was less entended then Quick going out there with a purpuse when nobody else had a thought about it, while Witkowski was basically hounded and provoked into the situation…
Just my observations… Sorry for the long text, its just how my hyperactive ADHD brain works lol…
Team needs to be dismantled because there old and staying up to late to feed the kids.This team is horrible and it’s time to start UNLOADING.This performance tonight was a f#$ing disgrace.Time to UNLOAD
So the rangers have 7 games at home with 1 or less goals scored out of 9 home games. Pathetic.
It's cool bud. Most of us know you ain't getting anymore cups and I'm not confused about that at all.
Quick's terrific performance was, again, wasted by the usual suspects:
Punchless offense. Again. And Rangers weren't facing Patrick Roy in his prime here.
Soft play, again. Detroit was all over Quick all night, bumping/pushing/Interfering. The 'scrums' are useless, settle nothing. The one player who could have stopped this and exacted retribution, Chmelar, was foolishly sent down.
Worst ref'ing this year. Kinda hard to win when Detroit is on the power play 2/3 of the game.
Three stars of the game should have been the refs, for Detroit. Disgusting in what they called – and what they missed or intentionally let go.
Quick deserves better, 39 and dudes top American goalie in the league
As soon as he shot the puck into the empty net, I knew something was going to happen. Just like when someone in MLB takes too long to run around the bases after a homerun. You may not agree with it, but those unwritten rules exist.
skate some laps-bunch of losers at home horrible effort and leaving your goalie out to dry where's the fire Call Torts Up/just for one practice
Quick just LYING like an absolute beta. What a loser. Hope he gets 10+ games.