So the ref logic here, I’m assuming, is that if Chucky wouldn’t have « embellished » the trip and instead kept his footing which would have probably not led to a tripping call… He wouldn’t have gotten called for embellishment. Is that it? It was either going to be a no call or both sides get a penalty? Because that makes no damn sense in any sport.
1 Comment
So the ref logic here, I’m assuming, is that if Chucky wouldn’t have « embellished » the trip and instead kept his footing which would have probably not led to a tripping call… He wouldn’t have gotten called for embellishment. Is that it? It was either going to be a no call or both sides get a penalty? Because that makes no damn sense in any sport.