Jonathan Quick est unique en son genre.
Le natif du Connecticut, qui a atteint son apogée en 2012, lorsqu’il a soutenu les Kings de Los Angeles, têtes de série inférieures, dans leur remarquable parcours vers la Coupe Stanley, a disputé le dernier match de sa longue et riche carrière dans la LNH lundi soir.
La seule question qui reste est de savoir si Quick se dirigera vers le Temple de la renommée du hockey.
Notre chroniqueur, Jesse Granger, explique pourquoi le quadragénaire mérite une place dans la salle :
—
TheAthletic
24 Comments
As a Devils fan, I hate Quick.
As a hockey fan, one of the best goalies I’ve seen in my lifetime.
Is there any debate?
He’s probably the best American goalie ever, won 2 Cups, has the most wins.
I think Dominik Hasek was the most unorthodox goalie !! hence the Dominator ! what is quick’s legendary nickname?
I didn’t know this was in dispute.
First ballet no doubt
But not Chris Osgood
Got to be first ballot. Most wins by US goalie, three cups (one they barely made the playoffs to winning it due greatly to his play) and from a goalie pov literally changed the game with his style, VH and RVH were popularized by him.
[deleted]
He’ll be there.
Blue Jackets Legend 🙌
100% agree that he is a HHoFer
But he was far from the first goalie to play an aggressive, crouching style. That was pretty much all goalies in the 70s/80s.
Was rooting for the rangers when they played them in scf because Lundqvist deserved one, but damn Quick got the upper hand, I was a bit sad. Great goalie
For sure!
Top NHL Goalie Wins (All-Time):
1. Martin Brodeur: 691
2. Marc-Andre Fleury: 561+ (Active)
3. Patrick Roy: 551
4. Roberto Luongo: 489
5. Ed Belfour: 484
6. Henrik Lundqvist: 459
7. Curtis Joseph: 454
8. Terry Sawchuk: 445
9. Jacques Plante: 437
10. Tony Esposito: 423
11. Glenn Hall: 407
12. Jonathan Quick: 410 (Retired 2026)
Is there really a debate about this 🤔
He has three cups and a Conn Smythe… End of the discusion.
As a Sharks fan, Quick deserves to be in the hall of fame.
I do not think a whole article was necessary on this subject.
I agree he should go in, the only thing against him is he didn’t win many personal awards and was only top 3 in Vezina twice.
2012 playoffs Quick alone probably cemented his place in the hall
Since when does 400 wins = HHOF?
For that matter; Quicks stats are PADDED (we have had the OT win 3 point game arguments for years now)
And as the main these stats are substantially padded; remove them and he drops down to below 300 wins
Kings win alot of OT/Shootouts during his tenure back to 2008
7+8+12(!)+11(!)+6+3+12(!)+3+14(!!)+2+11(!)+9+8+2+9=117
I mean yes being good in shootouts is important but cmon… we both know the Kings were notorious for grinding out games like that (can you imagine what Brodeur stats would look like if the trap era Devils had OT/SO wins?)
Is anyone really disputing this?
Nobody who knows anything about hockey needs to read an article justifying Jonathan Quick being in the Hall of Fame.
Lundqvist went in on the first ballot with one appearance in the Final losing (to Quick) in five games so yes, he is in.
Are there people who don’t think he deserves to be in the HOF??? Because they’re wrong.