@Canadiens de Montréal

[Engels] Quelques combos/appariements de premières lignes :


[Engels] Quelques combos/appariements de premières lignes :


eliarbss

44 Comments

  1. AutoModerator

    Hi there! It looks like you’ve posted an image. If this image is from an article, please provide a source. If it’s a meme, please ignore this comment. Thanks!

    *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Habs) if you have any questions or concerns.*

  2. Boomsticks

    I dunno healthy scratching Gally for Dach and Bolduc given how they have played makes no sense to me. At least not for Game 1.

  3. Phoenix__211

    J’aurais préféré conserver reinbacher dans l’alignement…

  4. Kotkaniemint

    Not a big fan of that 2nd line, the best our 2nd line has looked(not including Slafs brief stay) was when it was Newhook-Kapanen-Demidov. I’m not thrilled with adding in Texier and just hoping he can find some chemistry at the most important time of the season.

  5. -Son_of_Thror-

    Those D lines look like the worst possible combinations

  6. Beefiest_bison

    Hutson-Carrier and Matheson with Guhle on his offside is a bit spooky.

  7. haddonfieldsecret

    Not putting (will be Suzuki) and making a more gullible side of our fanbase think we’re scratching Nick for Joe would’ve been too funny for me to pass up lol.

  8. I think Gallagher should start over Dach. Could just be smoke and mirrors though. 

  9. sbrooksc77

    Hutson is significantly better on his left so I get it, but thats small pair.

  10. Struble – Xhekaj pairing god help us. What no Dobson does to a team. Why are we pairing our 2 smallest dmen together. Dach starting game 1 over Gallagher is laughable too.

  11. FlashyChapter

    I’ll be honest… very surprised by these combinations.

  12. SpaceWoodman

    I hope Dach is on an ejector seat. If he dont come out swinging game 1, switch him for Gallagher or Veleno.

  13. ddddeadhead1979

    Guys… the game is in 3 days this is not a pre-game warmup.

  14. mustardnight

    Struble-Xhekaj against tampa seems no bueno to me

  15. WritingGreedy766

    Sortez-moi Xhekaj de l’alignement au plus sacrant svp. Il n’y a aucun univers où il est un meilleur défenseur que Reinbacher.

  16. BigBoy990

    Texier sur la 2 pour moi c’est du niaisage et Reinbacher devrait jouer sur la 3ème paire 100%

  17. Ok-Television6344

    Pour le premier match, j’aurais mis Gallagher à la place de Dach, Bolduc ou Texier.

  18. Ill-Ad3660

    Je comprends pas pourquoi s’acharner a séparer Kapanen et Demidov…

  19. matthewdonut

    i’d prefer Reinbacher or Engstrom in the lineup. I like both Struble and Xhekaj, but it always feel like a disaster when both are on the ice together.

  20. TheVeilOverMyEyes

    it’s only the 20th chance for dach to prove he’s not useless, but it’s okay

    worst case scenario(he plays bad) he ends up a RFA, and best case scenario(he plays well) we can trade him

  21. HonestCrow

    Bolduc-Kapanen-Dach is the line that gets cut. I would also cut Struble and put Reinbacher in his place though, considering the way Tampa plays to provoke sometimes, I’d understand keeping him in.

    In whatever case, take Dach out and put Gally in.

    I still think Bolduc will pop off in the playoffs when he finally starts shooting.

  22. DangerDavez

    Yikes. Those defensive pairs are awful. Carrier just brings nothing and Struble with Xhekaj doesn’t work.

  23. Longtimelurker2575

    Not crazy about the defensive pairings. Nether Matheson or Guhle is very good on their off side and Hutson with Carrier is a very small pairing for playoff hockey. Would much rather Matheson/Carrier, Struble/Hutson, Guhle/Xhekaj. All those pairings have had success in the past.

  24. manfrommtl

    If that third line could find their nastiness, they would be elite! The forth line is legit Stanley Cup material.

  25. Subject_Translator71

    Struble – Hutson & Xhekaj – Carrier would have been better. Carrier got roughed up a lot last playoffs. If you’re gonna have Xhekaj in, it’s one way he could be useful.

  26. Damien_Karras_

    I’m ready to put Bolduc on the second line instead of Texier just to add some physicality and shot lethality. I know he’s not the best defensively, but having Newhook and his speed at center to backcheck, or have him hang back a little, could give the opportunity for Demi and Bolduc to punch offensively without it being too risky in case of turnovers

  27. damienHa23

    Struble and Xhekaj ?All respect to both of them but we’re cooked.

  28. CMDR_Traf85

    Lots of criticisms for a partial lineup 3 days before the game. I may not agree with all his choices, but I’m certainly at the point of trusting the coach with these decisions.

  29. DrLivingst0ne

    I’m not a fan of Texier on the 2nd line or on the bottom 6. 

    I think Kapanen on the 2nd line and Gallagher or Veleno in the bottom 6 makes more sense. Texier is the bottom forward IMO. Too soft for playoffs.

  30. jimmym007

    Honestly at this point a healthy and hungry Laine might honestly be better than Dach lol. But realistically Gally.

    I’d ride out the regular end of season 8 game streak lines but I wouldn’t be afraid to roll out:

    Caufield-Suzuki-Texier

    Slaf-Newhook-Demidov

    Bolduc-Kapanen-Gally

    Evans-Danault-Anderson

    It spreads the offense between 2 lines since we all know they’re going all shutdown mode on our first line. Slaf line 2 worked with Demi earlier so it’s not out of nowhere.

    Then line 3 is heavy effort/forecheck with decent defense, and L4 is pure shutdown. Could even swap Kapy and Evans for better faceoffs coverage. I’d even be tempted to swap Kapy all together for Veleno.

  31. I really really really don’t want to see Xhekaj and Struble together vs Tampa. Hope this is just a temporary thing and will change before the weekend. I expect it is because I’m sure Gally will play in game 1

  32. Our D worries me a bit as we have no real defensive D.

  33. Hutson Carrier is not great but I get it, we need at least one RHD in our top4 that Marty can rely on to play 20ish minutes.

  34. Welcome to the challenge of Depth!

    Tex New Demi is interesting, I dont remeber them being so memorable. I figured that we might go for chemistry more than potential. I thought Newhook Kappy and Demidov would end up becoming a bit of a lock. But that said everyone said Kapanen right ‘seat’ is as the 3C so this will be interesting.

    I just dont know if Newhook is exactly an upgrade at 2C

    I agree on the D pairs, I would replace Struble with Reinbacher personally,

  35. facepollution5

    Does anyone have a longer leash than Dach?

  36. Autismum_Prime

    What does Martin see in Veleno? PUT BLAIS IN!!!

  37. I hope Dach doesn’t get in, he’s been awful. I rather Gally

  38. bornecrosseyed

    I agree with the crowd on the D pairs but I love this forward setup. 

Write A Comment

Pin