@Maple Leafs de Toronto

[Blake] Keith Pelley nie certains reportages des dernières semaines : « Il y a eu d’innombrables rapports erronés… Que j’utilisais l’IA pendant la date limite des échanges… Que Neil est l’agent de John… Que Tie Domi était impliqué dans le processus… »


[Blake] Keith Pelley nie certains reportages des dernières semaines : « Il y a eu d’innombrables rapports erronés… Que j’utilisais l’IA pendant la date limite des échanges… Que Neil est l’agent de John… Que Tie Domi était impliqué dans le processus… »


PokePersona

26 Comments

  1. The-world-sports-fan

    I believe that there is SOME truth to the reporting, but I also believe it has probably been blown out of proportion a bit

  2. Dr_RickShaw

    More like all trade deadline decisions came from “me”, the Keith Pelley AI chatbot.

  3. Regular_Screen_5189

    There’s no substance to say he used Ai, Ai doesn’t even know what teams players are on right now. And it gets stats wrong, it would be a waste of time.

  4. boredinthebathroom

    Funny how he didn’t deny being involved in the trade deadline, funny how he said they spoke to 27 people but sundin said they began discussing a role for him last year. Pelley you bird, you are a successful guy but very dishonest.

  5. BlastingBegins

    But somehow everyone knew about the Chayka and Sundin hiring days in advance, cause they run such a tight ship 

  6. Throw down the gauntlet and prove him wrong. Show hard evidence. Expose him if he’s a liar.

    Otherwise these reporters are all the biggest losers of the day.

  7. Volderon90

    The fact those stories are even out there shows how unserious this management is. Not serious people. And that presser did nothing to discourage any of that reporting. 

    This team is back to being a joke like 2005-2017. Thank god I’m older now (36) and have other hobbies or else I’d lose my mind and I feel for the younger fan base we have now. 

  8. Chtholly13

    The ai part was stupid but we have stupid fans who believe this crap

  9. Status-Mulberry1857

    If Max Domi stays with the Leafs, then it will prove that Tie is definitely involved in the search of GM

  10. Mr_Wrecksauce

    I have to say, I really have a tough time believing anything that comes out of this guy’s mouth. Dude is greezy.

  11. Emergency_Wolf_5764

    More bald-faced lies from Pelley.

    He has no idea what he is doing, knows nothing about professional hockey, and not should be involved in the hiring of any hockey-related personnel.

    The comedy circus continues in Toronto.

    Next.

  12. McGrevin

    What’s interesting to me is a lot of those reports came from the athletic. Jonas has also been one of the most outright negative about everything in the org lately too

  13. peanut-arms

    Should have just scrolled down on the main page to see this but this is the part that stood out the most to me from the press conference. Like what a weird stance to take in a press conference. You are either saying that all these reporters are liars or you’re currently lying again to all of these reporters and I just find all that so weird.

  14. TwoTonsOfFur

    Untrue – if AI was used at the trade deadline, it would have proposed the exact same trade for Laughton as the previous year… but, our boy Brad was thinking one step ahead trying to create another data point for it to pull from so other folks will have bad trades after he’s fired too

  15. ilovetrouble66

    Where’s there’s smoke there’s fire!

  16. paranrml-inactivity

    In response to a bunch of comments calling in to question the Athletic story:
    There is a thing called « right of reply », « seeking comment » or « pre-publication notice » Which is when you have a number of sources that say the same thing, and you are confident in your information. Then you go to Keith Pelly and MLSE and you say: « this is my story. This is what I’m going to say in it, do you have anything you would like to say in response ». It serves several purposes simultaneously — basic fairness, journalistic accuracy, and legal protection (having offered right of reply is a meaningful shield if a defamation claim follows). Reputable outlets treat it as a non-negotiable step before publishing anything seriously damaging to a person or organisation. ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​The Athletic and it’s parent company the New York Times, 100% do this.

    Keith Pelly is full of shit — he definitely knew about the story, and he could have addressed it before the story went to print and had his response in the story. But he opted not to do that, and it made him look worse.

  17. We went from hearing about Pelley once in a blue moon to 10 times a day.

    There is erroneous reporting. He’s become the media’s new scapegoat for this franchise.

  18. Substantial_Ad_7027

    Keith Pelley fills me with rage.

  19. FelixPotvin94

    I do not trust a word out of Pelleys smug mouth

  20. Gankdatnoob

    Doing the « fake news » play huh? Nah that reporting was sourced for the NYTs. It was all real.

  21. futuresobright_

    He was so bothered that the public assumed he was making ChatGPT trades that he felt the need to address it. Just had to work that “preposterous” in there.

  22. Horror_Appearance_26

    He’s playing 2 truths and 1 lie

  23. ShillSniffer

    Dude will Barbara Streisand himself out of a job in no time. I’m here for it.

Write A Comment

Pin